ECMS 2020 Proceedings Edited by Mike Steglich, Christian Mueller, Gaby Neumann, Mathias Walther 2020
DOI: 10.7148/2020-0129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compensation Scheme With Shapley Value For Multi-Country Kidney Exchange Programmes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
3
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are multiple factors to be analyzed in a global coalition of registries, such as how much additional benefit can be generated for each registry, how the size of registries affects the relative gain of each registry, what are the effects of blood group distribution of pairs in a global coalition. Peter et al have compared two benefit-sharing schemes, which were based on Benefit value and Shapley Value and concluded that both schemes are similar with Shapley value based scheme having lower standard deviation [24].…”
Section: Simulation Planmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are multiple factors to be analyzed in a global coalition of registries, such as how much additional benefit can be generated for each registry, how the size of registries affects the relative gain of each registry, what are the effects of blood group distribution of pairs in a global coalition. Peter et al have compared two benefit-sharing schemes, which were based on Benefit value and Shapley Value and concluded that both schemes are similar with Shapley value based scheme having lower standard deviation [24].…”
Section: Simulation Planmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their simulations, they allowed 3-way exchanges for four countries and considered the potential and benefit values as target allocations, the latter yielding slightly more balanced solutions. Biró et al [12] compared the benefit value with the Shapley value. In their simulations, for three countries allowing 3-way exchanges, they found that the Shapley value produced smaller deviations from the targets on average.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biró et al [15] considered credit-based compensation systems from a theoretical point of view. They only allowed for 2-way exchanges but unlike [12,31], with the possibility of having weights for representing transplant utilities. They gave a polynomial-time algorithm for finding a maximum matching that minimized the largest deviation from a target allocation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations