2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.02.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compensation of large motion sensor displacements during long recordings of limb movements

Abstract: In motion capture applications using electromagnetic tracking systems the process of anatomical calibration associates the technical frames of sensors attached to the skin with the human anatomy. Joint centers and axes are determined relative to these frames. A change of orientation of the sensor relative to the skin renders this calibration faulty. is sensitivity regarding sensor displacement can turn out to be a serious problem with movement recordings of several minutes duration. We propose the "dislocation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2D), the largest range of difference was found in the lateral/medial component, the longitudinal axis being most susceptible to slippage of the inertial sensor as it is housed in a large rigid casing (38 Â 53 Â 21 mm 3 ). Finally, when rotations around all axes were considered, good agreement between methods was observed (see Table 1), with statistics consistent with those published by Saber-Sheikh et al (2010) who compared the XSens inertial sensor with an EMT system such as that used by Karch et al (2010).…”
Section: Validation Studysupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2D), the largest range of difference was found in the lateral/medial component, the longitudinal axis being most susceptible to slippage of the inertial sensor as it is housed in a large rigid casing (38 Â 53 Â 21 mm 3 ). Finally, when rotations around all axes were considered, good agreement between methods was observed (see Table 1), with statistics consistent with those published by Saber-Sheikh et al (2010) who compared the XSens inertial sensor with an EMT system such as that used by Karch et al (2010).…”
Section: Validation Studysupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The clusters were holed along the main axis to maximize flexibility across that axis, thus making it possible to bend the cluster and closely fit the profile of the limb. This approach limits slippages during movement or contact that may result in shifting of the cluster (a problem discussed in Karch et al, 2010 in the context of EMTs). A smooth fabric (in this case black felt) was placed between the skin and Velcro to avoid skin irritation.…”
Section: Marker Holder and Cluster Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ese angle time-series constitute the degrees of freedom of the model (according to [14,15,16]). At the age of 24 months the infants attended a follow-up examination in order to determine if they had developed .…”
Section: Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electromagnetic (EM) tracking systems [ 24 ] have been used in cooperation with motion sensor displacement removal methods [ 25 ] to surpass the line-of-sight requirements of optical systems, but suffer from movement limitations due to wiring.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%