Compensation gap, retrenchment strategy and organizational turnaround: a configurational perspective

Abstract

PurposeThis paper extends the current understanding of the retrenchment-–turnaround relationship in declined companies by introducing a compensation gap view. It argues that the effectiveness of the retrenchment strategy is contingent on reducing the executive-employee compensation gap in the turnaround process.Design/methodology/approachDrawing from a two-stage turnaround model and insights from the literature on executive-employee compensation gap, we develop and test a theoretical model that explains how five attributes, which refer to executive-employee compensation gap, asset retrenchment, cost retrenchment, ownership and size, affect the outcome of the organizational turnaround. This paper uses the fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) method and based on the samples of 112 listed companies that experience the decline between 2005 and 2013.FindingsThis paper concludes two valid causal paths and finds that small companies with small executive-employee compensation gap have a higher likelihood of successful turnaround when they implement cost or asset retrenchment actions. As for large state-owned companies, they should reduce the costs and maintain a small executive-employee compensation gap. An excessive compensation gap can be problematic, which could impair the organizational ability to cope with adversity and decline.Research limitations/implicationsFirst, this paper taps the vital role of employees in the turnaround process besides the mainstream “organizational decline-layoffs” logic, which hints a new human resource management strategy when organizations are facing decline. Second, this paper reveals the theoretical linkage between pay dispersion, internal stakeholder and organizational resilience. Third, as a methodological contribution, we introduce fsQCA, overcoming the shortcomings of turnaround strategy research with case and regression analysis and breaking through the paradigm of “specific factor-turnaround.”Practical implicationsOrganizational turnaround is a systematic process that constitutes multiple factors together. When organizations take the asset retrenchment to stop bleeding, reducing the executive-employee compensation gap will help enhance employee's cognition of organizational values and strategic goals, eliminate feelings of exploitation in retrenchment implementation and thus effectively promote turnaround. This paper also provides a basis for executive compensation restrictions and re-examines pay dispersion and economic inequality.Originality/valueThis study sheds some light on the importance of the executive-employee compensation gap in retrenchment strategy and contributes to both organizational turnaround and pay dispersion theories. Also, it reveals the theoretical linkage between internal stakeholders, organizational resilience and long-term orientation.

What Is Necessary for Digital Transformation of Large Manufacturing Companies? A Necessary Condition Analysis

“…Excessive pay gaps imply inequitable distribution within an organization. As strategy implementers, employees have negative emotions because they feel unfairly treated, reducing their commitment to organizational change [49]. In conclusion, Hypothesis 3 was verified, and Hypothesis 4 was not verified.…”

“…Pay gap (Gap). This paper defines a pay gap as the ratio of the average management pay to the average employee pay [49], where the average management pay is the ratio of the total annual pay of directors, supervisors, and executives to the size of the management. The size of the management is determined by the sum of the number of directors, supervisors, and executives minus the "number of independent directors" and the "number of unappointed directors".…”

Do They Mind the Gap? The Role of Founders in Organizational Pay Dispersion

“…Employees are frequently concerned with equal pay and fair treatment within the organization (Christie & Barling, 2010; Wade et al, 2006). They claim that pay allocation is a signal founders can use to show an organization’s attitude toward its employees (Bidwell et al, 2013; Tao et al, 2020). Accordingly, founders’ decisions on pay dispersion are influenced by their consideration of employees’ power as well as the urgency and moral legitimacy of their claim.…”

Enemies to frenemies: coopetition between online and offline retailers amidst crises

“…Crises such as epidemics Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) and pandemics [coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)] demand social distancing which is highly unfavourable for the retail industry. With the advancement of events such as social distancing causing crises (SDCC) organisations respond with turnaround strategies (Tao et al. , 2020).…”

“…[coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)] demand social distancing which is highly unfavourable for the retail industry. With the advancement of events such as social distancing causing crises (SDCC) organisations respond with turnaround strategies (Tao et al, 2020). In the initial stages of SDCC, e-tailers coped with spike in orders and rapid increase in first-time-online-shoppers with supply alliance formation and measures to control manpower shortage.…”