1985
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3032.1985.tb00066.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compensation by locusts for changes in dietary nutrients: behavioural mechanisms

Abstract: ABSTRACT. The detailed behavioural mechanisms underlying an instance of compensation for changes in dietary nutrients are described for the first time in an insect. Nymphs of Lucustu migruturiu L. were given one of four artificial diets on the third day of the fifth instar, and their feeding patterns recorded in detail for 12 h. The diets represented combinations of two protein and two digestible carbohydrate levels (28% and 14% dry weight) presented in an otherwise complete nutrient mix. At the nutrient level… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
206
2
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 260 publications
(217 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
6
206
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to CANGUSSU & ZUCOLOTO (1992) in studies with medfly Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann, 1824) fruitflies, using insects reared in laboratory on artificial diets, when a nutrient (protein in this case) is offered in different concentrations, the highest ingestion occurs when the concentration is small and therefore unsatisfactory to the organism needs. This compensatory response was already studied in other insects (SIMPSON & ABISGOLD, 1985;ABISGOLD & SIMPSON, 1987;HAMILTON & SCHAL, 1988;SIMPSON et al, 1989). Studies with Anastrepha suspensa (Loew, 1873) showed that compensatory responses did not occur to hydrolyzed yeast, but they did to carbohydrates (SHARP & CHAMBERS, 1984).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…According to CANGUSSU & ZUCOLOTO (1992) in studies with medfly Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann, 1824) fruitflies, using insects reared in laboratory on artificial diets, when a nutrient (protein in this case) is offered in different concentrations, the highest ingestion occurs when the concentration is small and therefore unsatisfactory to the organism needs. This compensatory response was already studied in other insects (SIMPSON & ABISGOLD, 1985;ABISGOLD & SIMPSON, 1987;HAMILTON & SCHAL, 1988;SIMPSON et al, 1989). Studies with Anastrepha suspensa (Loew, 1873) showed that compensatory responses did not occur to hydrolyzed yeast, but they did to carbohydrates (SHARP & CHAMBERS, 1984).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Increase of ingestion is not big enough to compensate for dilution. Besides that, no direct evidence has been observed up to now that insects self-regulate ingestion for caloric sake, as it seems to happen with rats (SIMPSON & ABISGOLD 1985).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…We made 24 artificial, dry diets that varied in P and C, as well as overall nutrition, based on the established protocol outlined by Simpson & Abisgold [44]. The distribution of these diets in nutritional space can be seen in the electronic supplementary material, figure S1, and the composition of these diets in the electronic supplementary material, table S1.…”
Section: (B) Artificial Diets and Measuring Diet Intakementioning
confidence: 99%