2020
DOI: 10.3390/molecules25133047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compensate for or Minimize Matrix Effects? Strategies for Overcoming Matrix Effects in Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Technique: A Tutorial Review

Abstract: In recent decades, mass spectrometry techniques, particularly when combined with separation methods such as high-performance liquid chromatography, have become increasingly important in pharmaceutical, bio-analytical, environmental, and food science applications because they afford high selectivity and sensitivity. However, mass spectrometry has limitations due to the matrix effects (ME), which can be particularly marked in complex mixes, when the analyte co-elutes together with other molecules, alteri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
80
0
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 190 publications
0
80
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…LC–MS/MS is susceptible to MEs, a common and unpredictable problem that can influence the validation process [ 119 ]. The ESI ionization is subject to ion suppression more than other atmospheric pressure ionization (API) techniques such as atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI) [ 120 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LC–MS/MS is susceptible to MEs, a common and unpredictable problem that can influence the validation process [ 119 ]. The ESI ionization is subject to ion suppression more than other atmospheric pressure ionization (API) techniques such as atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI) [ 120 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, the calibration curves can be prepared in a surrogate matrix for the quantification of endogenous analytes. Although the surrogate matrix can influence the analyte differently due to “matrix effect” 25 , calibration curve still provides important quantitative suitability parameters such as dynamic range and detection limits. In “omic” studies, quantification (“semi‐quantitation”) is commonly accomplished using the area ratio between the analyte and the corresponding isotopically labeled ISTD, spiked into the biological sample during the sample preparation and extraction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, the calibration curves can be prepared in a surrogate matrix for the quantification of endogenous analytes. Although the surrogate matrix can influence the analyte differently due to "matrix effect" 25 series ions are very stable and required high CE for fragmentation.…”
Section: Quantitative Analysis Of Targeted Gsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chromatographic method separates the chemical components in a mixture while spectroscopy provides selective information for identification of unknowns using standards or library spectra ( Patel et al., 2010 ). The combination of separation and spectroscopic detection techniques could demonstrate both quantitative and qualitative analysis of known drug compounds and unknown impurities in pharmaceutical matrices ( Cortese et al., 2020 ). Therefore, the characterization of unknown impurities requires sensitive, selective and sophisticated spectroscopic methods that could provide comprehensive structural information.…”
Section: Combination Of Hyphenated Chromatographic and Spectroscopic mentioning
confidence: 99%