2003
DOI: 10.2172/808473
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compendium of Regulatory Requirements Governing Underground Injection of Drilling Wastes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different types of rocks have different permeability characteristics; slurry injection relies on fracturing and the permeability of the formation receiving the injected slurry (Nagel, 2005, Puder et al, 2003. Most annular injection jobs inject into shale or other low-permeability formations, and most dedicated injection wells inject into highpermeability sand layers (Puder et al, 2003).…”
Section: ((Table 1))mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Different types of rocks have different permeability characteristics; slurry injection relies on fracturing and the permeability of the formation receiving the injected slurry (Nagel, 2005, Puder et al, 2003. Most annular injection jobs inject into shale or other low-permeability formations, and most dedicated injection wells inject into highpermeability sand layers (Puder et al, 2003).…”
Section: ((Table 1))mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different types of rocks have different permeability characteristics; slurry injection relies on fracturing and the permeability of the formation receiving the injected slurry (Nagel, 2005, Puder et al, 2003. Most annular injection jobs inject into shale or other low-permeability formations, and most dedicated injection wells inject into highpermeability sand layers (Puder et al, 2003). In spite of the type of rock selected for the injection formation, preferred sites will be overlaid by formations having the opposite permeability characteristics (high vs. low) (Veil andDusseault, 2003, Puder et al, 2003).…”
Section: ((Table 1))mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Nonhazardous wastes, such as water-treatment sludges (Ca 2 + rich), oily sand, and municipal biosolids, would be subject to far less stringent criteria than, for example, refinery wastes or solids with significant amounts of cadmium, lead, and selenium. In addition, within generally complex existing sets of regulatory constraints that are different for every jurisdiction (Puder et al, 2003), the disposal process should remain cost effective while providing high levels of environmental security.…”
Section: Need For a Screening Processmentioning
confidence: 99%