2019
DOI: 10.1093/forestry/cpz033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compatible taper-volume systems for major tropical species in Mexico

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0
4

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
2
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, stem taper differs among the four species analyzed. This result is consistent with other studies regarding the development of compatible taper and volume systems in different pine species that also reported differences in tree taper [31,38,49]. In these cases, the compatible segmented-stem system reported by Fang et al [50] was used for accounting differences between stem profiles for different species of Durango Mexico.…”
Section: Full Compatible System (Fcs)supporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consequently, stem taper differs among the four species analyzed. This result is consistent with other studies regarding the development of compatible taper and volume systems in different pine species that also reported differences in tree taper [31,38,49]. In these cases, the compatible segmented-stem system reported by Fang et al [50] was used for accounting differences between stem profiles for different species of Durango Mexico.…”
Section: Full Compatible System (Fcs)supporting
confidence: 90%
“…Thus, the reduced compatible system based on volume ratio RCS3 was proposed as the most suitable to be tested as a full model with dummy variables to assess whether separate models are necessary for describing the stem profile and predicting stem volume of the four pine species analyzed in this study. Similar approaches have been used to assess if there are no differences in predicting taper and merchantable volume for different species [31,38,49]. Some differences were showed for loblolly pine in two different plantations of the southeastern USA and Oklahoma USA for the same compatible system [10], also for some pine species in Durango Mexico [1].…”
Section: Reduced Compatible Systems (Rcs)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An investigation of each class for each validation statistic of TPP 2 indicated that the mean prediction error of dub prediction at any given h, h prediction at any given dub, and log volume prediction at any given log length was within 0.8-2.3%, 1.5-4.8%, and 1.8-2.5%, respectively (Table 4). Importantly, the model predicted all 3 values within 1.8% in the lower bole, due to more sample points, resulting in a relatively higher accurate prediction in the lower bole, which is a more valued section of a tree (Fonweban et al, 2011;Warner et al, 2016;Zheng et al, 2017;López-Martínez et al, 2019). Overall, there was reduction in prediction accuracy for samples collected toward the top of the tree and of log volume prediction in taller trees.…”
Section: Validation Of Calibrationsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…En este sentido, el modelo de Fang et al (2000) puede emplearse sin problemas en la planificación forestal, dado que incorpora de manera implícita la ecuación de volumen total de Schumacher y Hall (1933) y, a su vez, puede ser reemplazada por otra similar, según sea conveniente, lo que permite generar una mayor ganancia en el aprovechamiento (Niño-López et al, 2018). El modelo es capaz de describir el conjunto de datos del fuste y el volumen de cualquier especie sin ningún inconveniente (Özçelik y Göçeri 2015;Quiñonez-Barraza et al, 2014), además de las especies tropicales, lo que facilita su incorporación a los sistemas biométricos (López-Martínez et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified