2017
DOI: 10.3832/ifor2114-010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compatible taper-volume models of Quercus variabilis Blume forests in north China

Abstract: Compatible taper and volume models were created for Quercus variabilis Blume (cork oak) forests in North China. 174 trees were felled to obtain stem analysis data. Linear mixed effects analyses were used in modelling. Firstly, a bark thickness model was built. Then diameter at breast height over bark (DBHob) for the inner layers of the 174 trees could be calculated, based on which a total volume model was built. The estimated volume and a specific parameter restriction were then substituted into a polynomial t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Those types of taper models were first elaborated in British Columbia from 33 species groups (Kozak 1988), and these models are still evolving using different fitting methods (Socha et al 2020). In addition, Zheng et al (2017) indicated that variable taper equations can sometimes provide more flexible descriptions of tree profiles than simple taper equations, especially in the lower part of a stem. However, a disadvantage of variable-form taper equations is that they cannot be analytically integrated to calculate total stem or log volumes (Muhairwe 1999;Diéguez-Aranda et al 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Those types of taper models were first elaborated in British Columbia from 33 species groups (Kozak 1988), and these models are still evolving using different fitting methods (Socha et al 2020). In addition, Zheng et al (2017) indicated that variable taper equations can sometimes provide more flexible descriptions of tree profiles than simple taper equations, especially in the lower part of a stem. However, a disadvantage of variable-form taper equations is that they cannot be analytically integrated to calculate total stem or log volumes (Muhairwe 1999;Diéguez-Aranda et al 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a disadvantage of variable-form taper equations is that they cannot be analytically integrated to calculate total stem or log volumes (Muhairwe 1999;Diéguez-Aranda et al 2006). Moreover, Zheng et al (2017) claimed that those taper models suffered from statistical complexity, resulting in difficulty in being understood and correctly used by forest managers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Zheng, et al [51], compatible taper-volume models are flexible tools for total and merchantable volume prediction. Those models contain a taper equation and a total volume equation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An investigation of each class for each validation statistic of TPP 2 indicated that the mean prediction error of dub prediction at any given h, h prediction at any given dub, and log volume prediction at any given log length was within 0.8-2.3%, 1.5-4.8%, and 1.8-2.5%, respectively (Table 4). Importantly, the model predicted all 3 values within 1.8% in the lower bole, due to more sample points, resulting in a relatively higher accurate prediction in the lower bole, which is a more valued section of a tree (Fonweban et al, 2011;Warner et al, 2016;Zheng et al, 2017;López-Martínez et al, 2019). Overall, there was reduction in prediction accuracy for samples collected toward the top of the tree and of log volume prediction in taller trees.…”
Section: Validation Of Calibrationsmentioning
confidence: 96%