2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2010.12.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compatibilizing effects for improving mechanical properties of biodegradable poly (lactic acid) and polycarbonate blends

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
45
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sabet and Katbab pointed out that the incorporation of compatibilizers into the polymer/clay mixture during the blending process can be effective in increasing the degree of exfoliation of the silicate layers, and the presence of terminal hydroxylated edge groups of the modified nanolayers was responsible for the accelerated biodegradation of biopolyesters [15]. Maleic anhydridegrafting copolymers have been demonstrated to enhance the dispersion of fillers and nanoparticles in the polymer matrix [16][17][18][19][20], and the compatibilization of immiscible polymer blends [21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sabet and Katbab pointed out that the incorporation of compatibilizers into the polymer/clay mixture during the blending process can be effective in increasing the degree of exfoliation of the silicate layers, and the presence of terminal hydroxylated edge groups of the modified nanolayers was responsible for the accelerated biodegradation of biopolyesters [15]. Maleic anhydridegrafting copolymers have been demonstrated to enhance the dispersion of fillers and nanoparticles in the polymer matrix [16][17][18][19][20], and the compatibilization of immiscible polymer blends [21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PLA, PCL and their blends have been widely investigated because of a broad range of applications [16,17]. However, all kinds of blend have its limitations; for example, the melt blending of the two polymers results in poor improvement of toughness and a considerable decrease in stiffness and strength as a result of the immiscibility and weak interfacial adhesion [18][19][20][21]. For this reason, a compatibilization process is often carried out to reduce the size of the dispersed phase and/or to stabilize the morphology of the blends.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, a compatibilization process is often carried out to reduce the size of the dispersed phase and/or to stabilize the morphology of the blends. In order to improve compatibility and the blend final properties, methods such as addition of copolymers [22,23] or compatibilizer agents such as polymer grafted with maleic anhydride [21,24] and other monomers have been performed. However, in contrast to the melt blending, solution blending seems to be an effective and easy way to achieve the desired final properties of the polymer blend of PCL and PLA [1,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the appropriate blend components, it is possible to improve properties such as modulus, yield stress, impact strength and tensile strength. It is therefore not surprising that PLA has been blended with both nondegradable [5][6][7] and biodegradable polymers [8][9][10][11]. Typically, the blends of two different polymers leads to incompatible blends and shows different phases of blend morphologies i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%