2020
DOI: 10.1080/07370652.2020.1731016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compatibility study of NaN 5 with traditional energetic materials and HTPB propellant components

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The smaller endothermicity observed for metal salts was due to the presence of crystallization water. The decomposition temperatures of the cyclo‐N 5 − rings of Fe(N 5 ) 2 and Zn(N 5 ) 2 (121.49 and 112.35 °C, respectively) were lower than that observed for NaN 5 (129.71 °C) [34].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The smaller endothermicity observed for metal salts was due to the presence of crystallization water. The decomposition temperatures of the cyclo‐N 5 − rings of Fe(N 5 ) 2 and Zn(N 5 ) 2 (121.49 and 112.35 °C, respectively) were lower than that observed for NaN 5 (129.71 °C) [34].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…How to use reasonable thermal decomposition acceleration simulation experiments to accurately evaluate the stability and compatibility of samples with scientific and reasonable criteria has more practical significance. Currently, the methods for evaluating the compatibility of adhesives and explosives mainly include thermal analysis (including differential scanning calorimeter, differential thermal gravimetric analysis, thermostatic thermogravimetry and microcalorimeter analysis), gas analysis (including the Bourdon method and vacuum stability test) and mechanical sensitivity test, among which differential scanning calorimeter and the vacuum stability test are the most common [ 136 , 137 , 138 ].…”
Section: Challenges and Prospectsmentioning
confidence: 99%