2009
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.0902.1398
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compatibility of (co)actions and localizations

Zoran Škoda

Abstract: Earlier, Lunts and Rosenberg studied a notion of compatibility of endofunctors with localization functors, with an application to the study of differential operators on noncommutative rings and schemes. Another compatibility -of Ore localizations of an algebra with a comodule algebra structure over a given bialgebra -introduced in my earlier work -is here described also in categorical language, but the appropriate notion differs from that of Lunts and Rosenberg, and it involves a specific kind of distributive … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [34], we prove an interesting generalization of Theorem 5.8 for ρ-compatible localizations to localization-compatible pairs of entwining structures introduced therein.…”
Section: Theoremmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [34], we prove an interesting generalization of Theorem 5.8 for ρ-compatible localizations to localization-compatible pairs of entwining structures introduced therein.…”
Section: Theoremmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The notion of the compatibility of (co)monads and localization functors can easily be extended to the compatibility of actions of monoidal groups and localizations. For simplicity, we leave out this generalization (and present it in [34]). We implicitly (verbally in a definition) use it in the next section though.…”
Section: 11mentioning
confidence: 99%