2019
DOI: 10.1002/app.48440
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compatibility in biobased poly(L‐lactide)/polyamide binary blends: From melt‐state interfacial tensions to (thermo)mechanical properties

Abstract: The melt compatibility between poly(L-lactide) (PLA) and polyamides (PAs) with related thermomechanical properties is addressed. A particular attention is paid to four commercial PAs with extrusion processing temperatures close to PLA (PA10-10 to PA12). PLA/PA blend morphologies without a compatibilizer are first revealed by scanning electron microscopy. PA12 displays the best droplet dispersion into PLA (D n 700 nm), whereas a poor interfacial adhesion is attested for PLA/PA10-10 blends. Interfacial tensions … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(126 reference statements)
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The values of stress at yield, elongation at break, and Young's modulus evaluated by tensile tests are tabulated in Table 1. The poor ductility of PLA (3.4%) drastically improved by the addition of 30 wt.% PA12 (153%), indicating good compatibility as confirmed in our previous studies (Raj et al, 2019). PLA-g-MA was incorporated in the blends to observe the potential evolution of compatibility and its effect on mechanical properties.…”
Section: Mechanical Propertiessupporting
confidence: 72%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The values of stress at yield, elongation at break, and Young's modulus evaluated by tensile tests are tabulated in Table 1. The poor ductility of PLA (3.4%) drastically improved by the addition of 30 wt.% PA12 (153%), indicating good compatibility as confirmed in our previous studies (Raj et al, 2019). PLA-g-MA was incorporated in the blends to observe the potential evolution of compatibility and its effect on mechanical properties.…”
Section: Mechanical Propertiessupporting
confidence: 72%
“…It can be clearly seen that the droplet diameter decreases linearly up to 2 wt.% and an increment in the droplet size was noticed with a further increase in PLA-g-MA concentration. The lower droplet diameters, better interfacial adhesion, and stronger interface between the blend components of injection molded samples (Figure 6) when compared to compression molded samples (Figure 4) could be the reason for higher ductility in blends (Stoclet et al, 2011;Walha et al, 2016;Raj et al, 2019). It is interesting to observe that for injection molded samples, the droplet size of 5 wt.% PLAg-MA (0.96 µm) is lower than PLA/PA12 (70/30) (1.1 µm); this fine dispersion of PA12 droplets even at higher concentration of PLA-g-MA could be the reason for the ductility behavior of the blends at 5 wt.% of PLA-g-MA (260%).…”
Section: Morphology Of Injection Molded Samples-correlation With Mechmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations