2009
DOI: 10.1007/bf03191906
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compatibility between pricing rules and risk measures: The CCVaR

Abstract: Abstract. This paper has considered a risk measure ρ and a (maybe incomplete and/or imperfect) arbitrage-free market with pricing rule Π. They are said to be compatible if there are no reachable strategies y such that Π(y) is bounded and ρ(y) is close to −∞. We show that the lack of compatibility leads to meaningless situations in financial or actuarial applications.The presence of compatibility is characterized by properties connecting the Stochastic Discount Factor of Π and the sub-gradient of ρ. Consequentl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The properties of ρ (Assumption ) and Π allow us to establish Proposition . We will omit the proof because it is similar to one that can be found in Balbás and Balbás (). Proposition The following statements are equivalent.…”
Section: Preliminaries and Notationsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The properties of ρ (Assumption ) and Π allow us to establish Proposition . We will omit the proof because it is similar to one that can be found in Balbás and Balbás (). Proposition The following statements are equivalent.…”
Section: Preliminaries and Notationsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Let us now recall the notion of “compatibility” of Balbás and Balbás (). Definition The couple (ρ,Π) is said to be noncompatible if any of ( a ), ( b ), ( c ), ( d ), or ( e ) above hold.…”
Section: Preliminaries and Notationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Then there existsZ ∈ R such thatZ ∈ C(Z min ) andZ = Z min . Since Z min = Z ∈ C(Z min ), by definition there exists λ ∈ (0, 1] and Z 1 ∈ ρ such that 1 . By convexity of ρ we know that Z 2 ∈ ρ .…”
Section: Theorem 51 Suppose That the No Good Deal Assumption Does Nomentioning
confidence: 99%