2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2005.03.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compatibilisation effect of PP-g-MA copolymer on iPP/SiO2 nanocomposites prepared by melt mixing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

22
160
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 235 publications
(194 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
22
160
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, nanofiller addition produces a noticeable decrease in strain at break, probably because of strong interaction between filler and matrix [12]. Although an increase was expected as a result of smaller agglomerations, the opposite happened.…”
Section: Tensile Mechanical Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On the other hand, nanofiller addition produces a noticeable decrease in strain at break, probably because of strong interaction between filler and matrix [12]. Although an increase was expected as a result of smaller agglomerations, the opposite happened.…”
Section: Tensile Mechanical Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, these nanofillers are generally poorly dispersed in apolar thermoplastics (such as polyolefins), thus limiting their beneficial effects on the target thermo-mechanical properties. In order to enhance the dispersibility of nanofillers in polyolefins they are usually introduced after surface treatment [9][10][11] or together with suitable polymeric compatibilizers [12][13][14][15][16]. Nevertheless, with the aim of avoiding additional costs and processes, researchers have been looking for nanofillers which can be easily and homogeneously dispersed within the polymeric matrix without use of compatibilizers or surface treatments on the nanoparticles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, as can be seen in Figure 2a tensile strength reduces by increasing the CN content. This behaviour is maybe due to the interactions between the nanoparticles themselves, as more and larger agglomerates are formed, which act as stress concentrators and ultimate failure points of the material [13,17]. Generally, the drop in the tensile strength has been attributed to the reduction of the polymer fraction in the transverse cross-section of the polymer [27], which becomes an even greater issue due to the extremely large surface area of the filler used, and the presence of stress concentration around the filler's particles [28].…”
Section: Mechanical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most products require a balance between stiffness and impact strength, and this need has been met using several nanoparticles, at loadings of 10% or less, increasing the range of the material's applications [13][14][15]. Although nanocomposites can be prepared either through melt compounding [16][17][18][19][20] solution blending [21], in situ polymerization techniques [22,23] and sol-gel reactions [24], due to its compatibility with current industrial processes, such as extrusion and injection molding, the absence of organic solvents, and its suitability with most commodity polymers, melt-mixing is 4 probably the most industrially feasible and versatile technique amongst the various strategies used for the preparation of nanocomposites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%