2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-44206-8_23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compassion as a Practical and Evolved Ethic for Conservation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These reject the utilitarian view of the environment drawing inspiration from traditional cultures and a broader concept of 'compassionate conservation' (Munro 2001;Ramp and Bekoff 2015), and include spiritual ecology (Sponsel 2014) and deep ecology perspectives (Naess 1973).…”
Section: Environmental Justice and Ethicsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These reject the utilitarian view of the environment drawing inspiration from traditional cultures and a broader concept of 'compassionate conservation' (Munro 2001;Ramp and Bekoff 2015), and include spiritual ecology (Sponsel 2014) and deep ecology perspectives (Naess 1973).…”
Section: Environmental Justice and Ethicsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Ethically, supporters of ecological justice have argued that at present concerns for human life, human welfare, is taken for granted, but ecological justice and animal rights are not (e.g. Finsen and Finsen 1994;Baxter 2005;Cafaro and Primack 2014;Miller, Soulé, and Terborgh 2014;Ramp and Bekoff 2015).…”
Section: Environmental Justice and Ethicsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Transitioning to predator‐friendly production is likely to gain increasing momentum because it links two strongly supported social values: animal welfare and biodiversity conservation (Treves & Bruskotter ; Ramp & Bekoff ; Lute et al ). Although most attention on animal production has so far focused on the humane treatment of livestock, there is growing recognition that much animal production also involves killing of wild animals, and this killing often entails a high degree of suffering.…”
Section: A Predator‐friendly Futurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…). These programs also usually fail to define, defend, and meet clear objectives (Ramp & Bekoff ). For example, across Australia, 68% of conservation‐culling programs targeting medium to large wild mammals do not monitor the targeted control or recovery species, and <3% follow basic experimental design standards (Reddiex & Forsyth ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%