“…In the figures, OTU relative abundance data are shown untransformed to provide an intuitively meaningful display of original data. Analyses of relative abundances of individual OTUs were performed using only common OTUs, defined as OTUs present in at least 25% of samples in the population, survey visit, or experiment being analyzed (yielding 51,50,38,68,33, and 60 common OTUs in the Marmot, Mono, Unicorn, Conness, Experiment, and Temporal analyses, respectively). The effect on type I statistical error of individually testing multiple OTUs (i.e., multiple comparisons) was accounted for by calculating the false discovery rate, Q, using the program Qvalue (76) and applying a maximum threshold of Q = 0.05 (77).…”