Compartmentalisation of beachface sediments along the southwestern coast of Australia

Sanderson, Peta G.; Eliot, Ian

doi:10.1016/s0025-3227(99)00046-8

Cited by 36 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Influences of headlands, outcrops, and engineering structures in beach and surf zone dynamics are, nevertheless, frequently acknowledged regarding patterns of wave refraction and attenuation, development of cellular circulation, occurrence of sediment by-passing, and notably in the constraining of cross and longshore processes (e.g. Sanderson and Eliot, 1999;Short, 1999;Larson and Kraus, 2000;Gallop et al, 2011b;Scott et al, 2011).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Geologically constrained morphological variability and boundary effects on embayed beaches

2012

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

a b s t r a c tKeywords: coastal embayment geological control hard-bottom empirical orthogonal functions hydrodynamic forcing Headlands, rock outcrops and engineering structures impact beach and nearshore dynamics of coastal embayments, inducing boundary effects that constrain the lateral and vertical beach variability. This study analyses morphological change in six embayed beaches with diverse levels of exposure to wave action and various degrees of geological control in the mesotidal coast of southwestern Portugal. The aim is to identify whether geological boundaries constrain the morphological behaviour of embayed beaches and assess whether their effects can be decoupled from datasets of morphological change. Topographic data, obtained over a two-year period on each of the six embayments, were analysed using empirical orthogonal functions (EOF) to decompose temporal and spatial variability in the datasets. First and second mode eigenfunctions were explored using time-variable linear correlation analysis with several nearshore parameters that include hydrodynamic variables, sedimentary and geometric characteristics of each embayment in order to derive forcing-response relationships. Our results demonstrate that natural geological boundaries constrain the morphological behaviour of embayed beaches, producing conspicuous alongshore variability in all embayments. Localised responses induced by lateral and vertical boundary interference with beach and nearshore dynamics include beach rotation, topographically-controlled rip circulation and restrained profile fluctuation. Spatial decoupling in cross-and longshore responses is accompanied by a temporal decoupling in response times, both of which are slower in more constrained embayments (from 1 day in exposed embayments to 1 week or more in the most sheltered ones). Normalised wave power was correlated at the 99% confidence level with the primary mode of morphological variability at most embayments, which represent 67% to 94% of the variance in the datasets. This correlation stresses the importance of combined parameterization of wave and tide forcing in process-response relations between hydrodynamics and morphological change for mesotidal coastal environments. Lateral and vertical geological boundaries exert their effects fundamentally by restraining longshore sediment transport, inducing cellular surf zone circulation and by impacting cross-shore sediment transport. It is postulated that decreasing sediment abundance and substrate depth intensify vertical boundary effects, while higher indentation and wave obliquity enhance the effects of lateral boundaries.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Geologically constrained morphological variability and boundary effects on embayed beaches

2012

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Development of a coastal sediment budget offers a means of identifying the links between coastal sediment sources and storages or sinks. Coastal sediment budget calculation is undertaken within a defined littoral cell (Bowen and Inman, 1966;Komar, 1996;Sanderson and Eliot, 1999;Eittreim et al, 2002). A conceptual model is prepared identifying the key elements (inputs, stores, sinks, outputs) and the transfers between them.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Estimating the fluvial sediment input to the coastal sediment budget: A case study of Ghana

2012

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Whether or not the coastline is gravel and/or sand depends on position relative to the large-scale hydrodynamic and aeolian processes that transported and sorted marine sand during the Holocene. Sanderson and Eliot (1999), Sanderson (2000) and Sanderson et al (2000) considered regional patterns in shoreline configuration and the implications for long-term morphodynamic evolution. Nichol (2002) investigated the stratigraphy of a last interglacial beach ridge system.…”

Section: Shoreline Evolutionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Coastal geomorphology into the twenty-first century

Stephenson

Brander

2003

Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Compartmentalisation of beachface sediments along the southwestern coast of Australia

Cited by 36 publications

References 17 publications

Geologically constrained morphological variability and boundary effects on embayed beaches

Geologically constrained morphological variability and boundary effects on embayed beaches

Estimating the fluvial sediment input to the coastal sediment budget: A case study of Ghana

Coastal geomorphology into the twenty-first century

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About