1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0169-2607(98)00025-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compartmental models for glycaemic prediction and decision-support in clinical diabetes care: promise and reality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…22 While the simulations were shown to be unsuitable for individual patient glycemic prediction and therapy planning, they have found widespread use for educational/demonstration/self-learning purposes where individual predictive accuracy is less critical. 23,24 Using the evaluation scheme shown in Figure 1, the current report would fit under level 4 (anecdotal evidence including user comments and reviews). While this feedback has been very encouraging, the next stage in the evaluation process is clearly to undertake level 3 observational studies (including the use of surveys and more formal questionnaires 21 ) and prospective RCTs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 While the simulations were shown to be unsuitable for individual patient glycemic prediction and therapy planning, they have found widespread use for educational/demonstration/self-learning purposes where individual predictive accuracy is less critical. 23,24 Using the evaluation scheme shown in Figure 1, the current report would fit under level 4 (anecdotal evidence including user comments and reviews). While this feedback has been very encouraging, the next stage in the evaluation process is clearly to undertake level 3 observational studies (including the use of surveys and more formal questionnaires 21 ) and prospective RCTs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, equations have been introduced in the literature for tracking the carbohydrate intake as it is converted to blood glucose which then interacts with the kidneys, liver, muscles, and other body systems. Most physiological models characterize the overall dynamics into three compartments: meal absorption dynamics, insulin dynamics, and glucose dynamics [6], [7], [8]. Since they are based on the same data, the equations used in the literature to model the underlying processes are almost identical [8], [9].…”
Section: Physiological Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A physiological-based compartmental model has the advantage that the simulations can yield insight into the physiological parameters (Erzen, et al;. Such a model offers a powerful tool for generating predictions and clinical decision support in diabetes care (Lehmann, & Deutsch, 1998;Halim et al;1993). Here, a physiological-based compartmental model is used to design and test the tracking control.…”
Section: Blood Glucose Control Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%