2019
DOI: 10.1080/17538947.2019.1633424
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparisons of two global built area land cover datasets in methods to disaggregate human population in eleven countries from the global South

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
37
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To produce the population distribution maps needed for validation, we first generated the aggregated version of the L1-units, following a sampling and merging methodology similar to that employed by Stevens et al [43]. For each country, we started by randomly selecting one third of the L1-units.…”
Section: Random Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To produce the population distribution maps needed for validation, we first generated the aggregated version of the L1-units, following a sampling and merging methodology similar to that employed by Stevens et al [43]. For each country, we started by randomly selecting one third of the L1-units.…”
Section: Random Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Representative examples include recent population distribution datasets that have been produced on the basis of the World Settlement Footprint 2015 products (WSF2015 and WSF2015-Density) [32]; the new WorldPop Sub-Saharan gridded building datasets [33][34][35]; or through the joint analysis of high-resolution binary built-area products [36,37], such as the Global Urban Footprint [38,39], the High Resolution Settlement Layer [23,40] and the Global Human Settlement Layer [41,42], respectively. Here, the particular focus placed on built-area datasets for population modelling arises from the fact that different research has demonstrated that when built-area datasets are used to restrict the distribution of the population, the final products deliver better qualitative and quantitative results in comparison to those models where the datasets are not included [37,43]. In fact, other research has shown that when a given built-area dataset is accurate and coherent enough with population densities, it has the potential to be used as a single proxy for population modelling [43].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It also addresses the notoriously flawed administrative boundaries, especially in proximity of coastal areas. Stevens et al (2019) provide insights on how the available built-up information products affect the ability to predict population density and distributions. The paper stresses that builtup data are very often the most important predictor of populated places and better insights in their accuracies may help in improving population density grids.…”
Section: Papers Of This Special Issuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these areas, the rapid influx of migrants can strain local health systems, food and water supplies, sanitation and waste management systems, as well as other public services such as education, and thus lead to a diverse set of environmental, social and health impacts [3,6]. It is therefore of crucial importance for policy makers to understand the spatial and temporal population growth patterns within their constituency for adequate resource allocation, development planning or disaster management [7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%