2013
DOI: 10.1111/jog.12112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparisons of the morbidity outcomes in repeated cesarean sections using midline and Pfannenstiel incisions

Abstract: Operative complications, operative time, postpartum complications and neonatal outcomes were comparable between low midline and Pfannenstiel groups in repeated cesarean sections irrespective of the previous technique used.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our analysis for types of incision data showed that the Pfannenstiel incision was used in the vast majority of the cases for both the study group (97.2%) and the controls (99.0%). No statistically significant difference was found between the groups regarding types of incision, similar to the observation of the cohort study conducted at the King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand (7). In addition, we found a significant difference in the type of anesthesia that had been used between our study group and the control group.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our analysis for types of incision data showed that the Pfannenstiel incision was used in the vast majority of the cases for both the study group (97.2%) and the controls (99.0%). No statistically significant difference was found between the groups regarding types of incision, similar to the observation of the cohort study conducted at the King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand (7). In addition, we found a significant difference in the type of anesthesia that had been used between our study group and the control group.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…According to the American Center for Disease Control and Prevention, the cesarean delivery rate was 20.7% in 1995 in the United States (US) which substantiality increased to 31.9% in 2016 (6). In addition, there was a study conducted at the King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thailand showing that the number of CSs performed has dramatically increased in several countries over the past ten years, they reported that the CS rate has increased from 34.4% in 2003 to 46.5% in 2011 (7). According to the Turkish Demographic and Health Survey, the CS rate in 1993 was 8% and later increased to 37% in 2008, as reported by other studies (8).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Makoha et al found that in the presence of one or more prior CD, a vertical skin incision was associated with a higher odds of bladder injury (OR 3.89, 95% CI 1.4-8.9) [6]. However, other studies have not supported this finding or discerned other differences in outcomes based on the type of skin incision [9,10].…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…A MEDLINE search for publications in English between January 1, 1980 and November 30, 2014, using the keywords ''repeat cesarean delivery'', ''higher-order cesarean delivery'', ''multiple cesarean section'' or ''multiple cesarean delivery'', and ''skin incision'' or ''skin incision type'' or ''abdominal skin incision'', yielded only three studies specifically concerned with the type of skin incision and obstetric morbidity [6,9,10] with one study being limited to emergent CDs [9], and two studies including both primary and repeat CDs [6,10]. Correspondingly, the skin incision type that minimizes operative morbidity for women who are having a CD after multiple prior CDs is uncertain.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,23 In general, a vertical skin incision is thought to have higher rates of postoperative complications, although recent studies have challenged this idea. [24][25][26][27] In an effort to routinely employ a transverse suprapubic skin incision, it has become routine in our institution to retract the pannus in a rostral direction using adhesive tape placed after induction of anesthesia and before surgical preparation of the skin. However, it can be argued that such cephalad retraction of the pannus might promote subclinical hypoventilation due to resultant changes in diaphragmatic excursion or decreases in chest wall compliance, resulting in maternal hypercarboxemia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%