2019
DOI: 10.2298/tsci190411344t
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparisons of six different estimation methods for log-Kumaraswamy distribution

Abstract: In this paper, it is considered the problem of estimation of unknown parameters of log-Kumaraswamy distribution via Monte-Carlo simulations. Firstly, it is described six different estimation methods such as maximum likelihood, approximate bayesian, least-squares, weighted least-squares, percentile, and Cramer-von-Mises. Then, it is performed a Monte-Carlo simulation study to evaluate the performances of these methods according to the biases and mean-squared errors of the estimators. Furthermore, two real data … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(32 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The acceptance-rejection algorithm is used to generate the data from distribution. BFGS algorithm is carried out to get the five estimates given in ( 5)- (9). The simulation results are summarized via Figs.…”
Section: Simulation Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The acceptance-rejection algorithm is used to generate the data from distribution. BFGS algorithm is carried out to get the five estimates given in ( 5)- (9). The simulation results are summarized via Figs.…”
Section: Simulation Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors also discussed some properties and different estimation methods such as maximum likelihood, ordinary and weighted least squares, percentile and maximum product spacing this new distribution in [8]. The methods of estimation for log-Kumaraswamy distribution were studied in [9]. Afify et al [10] considered different methods of estimation for Weibull Marshall-Olkin Lindley distribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%