2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.juogr.2014.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparisons of pore size distribution: A case from the Western Australian gas shale formations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
99
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 210 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
99
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the methods, the MICP is relatively fast and convenient. Hinai et al 47 confirmed that the MICP method can be a reliable technique for understanding pore throat size distribution decrease to 3 nm and determining most porosity involved in fluid transportation. The method is also reliable in shale samples.…”
Section: Spontaneous Imbibition In Porous Mediamentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Among the methods, the MICP is relatively fast and convenient. Hinai et al 47 confirmed that the MICP method can be a reliable technique for understanding pore throat size distribution decrease to 3 nm and determining most porosity involved in fluid transportation. The method is also reliable in shale samples.…”
Section: Spontaneous Imbibition In Porous Mediamentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Subsequently, another concept related to Hydraulic Flow Units (HFUs) was proposed (Yan et al, 2011;Sachsenhofer and Koltun, 2012;Clarkson et al, 2013;Wilson et al, 2016), which was defined as the minimum units in reservoir and the volume of rocks with similar petrophysical character that affects fluid flow, and classified by Sedimentary Microfacies Zonations (SMZ). SMZ technique has many limitations in the quantitative division in the vertical and flame due to the fuzzy microphase bound (Hinai et al, 2014). First quantitative method was proposed by Amaefule et al (1993), using the parameters Flow Zone Indicator (FZI) and Reservoir Quality Indicators (RQI) derived from the modified Kozeny-Carmann (K-C) equation:…”
Section: Pore Type and Hfusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Summary for the current improved methods based on the K-C equation for HFUs determination established by Hinai et al (2014). pressure curve) is an important constitutive relationship in complex 3D porous structures for characterizing the transmission of fluid and mass, since it controls the fluids distribution in the pore space during drainage and imbibition processes.…”
Section: Capillary Pressure Curves From Pore-scale Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the distribution of the multiple exponential decay processes in rocks which are T 2 spectrum means the pore size distribution of the core. The pore throats reflected by T 2 spectral line of core of target block are mainly divided into three categories: clay-bound water pore, capillary-bound water pore, and free fluid pore [14,15]. T 2 spectrum cut-off value is obtained from empirical value and chart method.…”
Section: Relation Between Pore Throat Size and Nmr T 2 Spectrummentioning
confidence: 99%