Bladder cancer is the sixth most common tumour in Canada and ranks eighth in terms of cancer mortality. Up to now, management of this condition relied mostly on surgical and intravesical treatments once the disease is established. Chemoprevention is an attractive option to prevent the disease in high-risk populations and may well reduce the costs related to its treatment. This review examines the available data on chemoprevention strategies in bladder cancer, with special emphasis on randomized controlled trials when available.Can Urol Assoc J 2009;3(Suppl4):S184-7
IntroductionBladder cancer (BC) is one of the most expensive cancers to treat in North America due to its recurrent nature necessitating investigative follow-up and intravesical treatments, and due to comorbidities related to major surgery in cases of invasive cancer. In Canada, BC represents the sixth most common tumour type and ranks 8th with respect to cancer mortality. 1 Of the 3 main histological variants of BC (Table 1), transitional cell carcinoma is the most prevalent in North America, 2 and thus constitutes the object of this review.For a variety of reasons, BC is a disorder very well suited to chemoprevention. First, its natural history is characterized by frequent recurrences, which need to be minimized. Second, in addition to the role of genetic susceptibility, the pathogenesis of BC also correlates with environmental factors such as cigarette smoking, implying sustained contact of urinary carcinogens with the urothelium. The rationale behind chemoprevention lies, therefore, in reducing or preventing the intimate contact of these chemicals with bladder mucosa. Additionally, chemopreventive compounds administered systemically and excreted in urine have the favourable pharmacokinetic property of remaining in close prolonged contact with bladder epithelium. Finally, diagnostic methods in BC allow easy bladder access and tissue sampling for evaluation of the efficacy of prevention strategies.Three types of prevention have been defined: primary prevention, which focuses on avoiding development of cancer in healthy subjects; secondary prevention, which targets premalignant lesions with the intent of avoiding their progression to cancer; and tertiary prevention, which focuses on preventing cancer progression in patients diagnosed with and treated for the disease. Primary and tertiary prevention strategies apply well to BC. However, in the case of primary prevention, because it pertains to a nonafflicted population, this strategy implies that the trade-off between the risk/inconvenience of intervention and the anticipated benefit is substantial. It also implies that a population at risk, in which intervention is warranted, can be identified. These restrictions make primary intervention, albeit attractive conceptually, somewhat difficult to implement in practice. Tertiary intervention is already widely practiced in BC in the form of intravesical treatment, but other alternatives with less toxicity have yet to be explored. This review report...