2005
DOI: 10.1007/bf02831485
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparisons of overstress theory with an empirical model in creep prediction for cohesive soils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Research methods for the rheological model are mainly divided into empirical equation and component combination [8,9]. Logarithmic, exponential, and power functions are adopted in the empirical equation to describe the strain-time relation with few fitting parameters and strong pertinence based on the creep test results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Research methods for the rheological model are mainly divided into empirical equation and component combination [8,9]. Logarithmic, exponential, and power functions are adopted in the empirical equation to describe the strain-time relation with few fitting parameters and strong pertinence based on the creep test results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ε is the creep acceleration. Equations (8) and (9) show that strain ε is the function of time t during the coal creep process. Only when E 3 < 0 can the creep rate and creep acceleration be above zero, because the acceleration index n, yield stress σ s , and nonlinear viscosity coefficient η(t) are the constants that are greater than zero, indicating that the strain of the nonlinear viscoelastic-plastic body will increase over time.…”
Section: Introduction Of Negative Elastic Modulus E 3 (Shear Modulus mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on experimental investigations, various viscoelasticplastic models [11,12] taking into account soil and rock microstructure and damage have been proposed. ese models can be classified into three categories: empirical models, rheological models, general stress-strain-time models [7,13], and damage-involved models [14,15]. e empirical models are mainly obtained by fitting the experimental results from creep tests; due to its relatively simple mathematical formulation and few parameters, the empirical models [16][17][18] are widely used to simulate the creep behavior of various soils.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e empirical models are mainly obtained by fitting the experimental results from creep tests; due to its relatively simple mathematical formulation and few parameters, the empirical models [16][17][18] are widely used to simulate the creep behavior of various soils. Rheological models usually use differential representation, visualizing the material by the elementary mechanical models composed of elastic springs, plastic sliders, and viscous dashpots [13,19,20]. e general stress-strain-time models are often in the incremental form and usually implemented in numerical software [21], such as the overstress model proposed by Karstunen and Yin [22] and the further extended overstress model by Yin et al [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%