2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.01.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparisons of novel and efficient approaches for permeability prediction based on the fabric architecture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, common simulation practice is to start with permeability values as found in the literature for similar materials, rather than performing an experimental determination of K with fabric samples under planned infusion process conditions. For the type of materials and fibre bed architecture considered in this work, the permeability value and variation range reported by [31,32,34,37] can be considered. Thus, based on these studies, the lower bound for a suitable permeability value could be set to K = 6.7 · 10 −12 m 2 , while an upper bound could be considered as K = 3.1 · 10 −11 m 2 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, common simulation practice is to start with permeability values as found in the literature for similar materials, rather than performing an experimental determination of K with fabric samples under planned infusion process conditions. For the type of materials and fibre bed architecture considered in this work, the permeability value and variation range reported by [31,32,34,37] can be considered. Thus, based on these studies, the lower bound for a suitable permeability value could be set to K = 6.7 · 10 −12 m 2 , while an upper bound could be considered as K = 3.1 · 10 −11 m 2 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, a permeability value needs to be determined. Numerical techniques described in literature [31,32] can be used to determine the permeability of the fabric. However, the high dependence of permeability on material parameters such as reinforcement architecture, layup sequence, etc., results in considerable variation when evaluating this parameter through analytical or numerical methods.…”
Section: Step 1-model Initialisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the approaches for permeability prediction 7,19,23,24 are based on the multi-scale homogenisation procedure, which assumes separation of the scales to simplify the modelling of the flow, e.g. flow in a unidirectional (UD) fibre bundle (micro-scale) is considered separately from the meso-scale flow and then homogenised.…”
Section: Permeability Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental data from those studies were used in the models of textile reinforcements with variability in the geometry and used for prediction of probability of draping outcomes, 8 distribution of mechanical properties 12 and permeability. 7,[16][17][18][19][20] In particular, it was demonstrated that the mould fill time can be several times longer than the fill time in the deterministic case. 18 The geometry of a dry reinforcement can be described by a model where tow position, tow width and other details are described by a set of random variables, which may be mutually independent or can be correlated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A pioneering work was done by Lomov et al (2001) who developed a software tool, WiseTex, for geometry modelling of internal structure of textile reinforcement, such as 2D/3D woven, bi-axial/triaxial braided and knitted etc., transferring data into general FE codes. A similar work was carried out by a Textile Composites Research Group at the University of Nottingham in UK (Wong et al 2006). A Python-based open-source software, TexGen, combined geometry building with volume-meshing algorithms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%