2000
DOI: 10.1080/002077200418397
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparisons of nonhomogeneous Poisson process software reliability models and its applications

Abstract: In this paper, existing software reliability models based on an nonhomogeneous Poisson process (NHPP) are summarized. A recently developed NHPP model with imperfect debugging and time-dependent fault detection rate is examined. T he results show that this proposed model provides improved descriptive and predictive power when compared with other existing NHPP models. T he model can also be incorporated into a software cost model for reliability assessment. T he optimal release policies which minimize the expect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given different expressions and explanations of a(t) and b(t), many NHPP SRGMs can be developed [15]. The basic assumption illustrated by the above formulation can also hold in the context of OSS [9].…”
Section: Modeling Fault Detection Process Of Open Source Softwarementioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Given different expressions and explanations of a(t) and b(t), many NHPP SRGMs can be developed [15]. The basic assumption illustrated by the above formulation can also hold in the context of OSS [9].…”
Section: Modeling Fault Detection Process Of Open Source Softwarementioning
confidence: 96%
“…The total expected cost including both testing cost and operation cost is a crucial factor for such determination [14][15][16]. In fact, the software cost estimation is also important in software development [17].…”
Section: Determination Of Optimal Version-update Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…MVF's are obtained and tabulated in Table 1 for the fault detection rate functions appeared in the literature. [1][2][3][4][5][6][15][16][17][18][19][20] The MVF's in Table 1 are superscribed with i in order to distinguish them from the MVF's of the general T-D dependent NHPP SRGM, 13 which are denoted by m j (t). The fault detection rate functions in Table 1 can be classified into two categories: The scale-variant fault detection rate function and the scale-invariant fault detection rate function.…”
Section: Mvf's For Uniform Testing and Constant Fault Reduction Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to achieve the reliability goal of software, many researchers have devoted to various software reliability growth models (SRGMs) [3][4][5][6]. However, accurate software reliability estimation is not usually available until the software has been tested by a large number of failure data for a longer period of time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%