2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2006.10.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparisons of IRI TEC predictions with GPS and digisonde measurements at Ebro

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This provides the opportunity to study the TEC prediction. Moreover, the availability of historic TEC data is important for the development of the IRI model (Mosert, 2007), as well as the NN model which can learn from prior data (Watthanasangmechai et al, 2010). Better representations of the region above the F peak are of critical importance for many investigations that require TEC predictions (Bilitza, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This provides the opportunity to study the TEC prediction. Moreover, the availability of historic TEC data is important for the development of the IRI model (Mosert, 2007), as well as the NN model which can learn from prior data (Watthanasangmechai et al, 2010). Better representations of the region above the F peak are of critical importance for many investigations that require TEC predictions (Bilitza, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model is an empirical one developed using available data from all around the world, and has been widely accepted as a dependable ionospheric model (Bilitza, 2001;Bilitza and Reinisch, 2008). The IRI model is however more accurate in predicting the bottom-side ionosphere than the topside ionosphere since it is derived mostly from ionosonde data, and as such not a very good candidate for topside ionospheric modeling as is evident in the works of Mosert et al (2007) and Kailiang and Jianming (1994). The NeQuick model (Hochegger et al, 2000;Radicella and Leitinger, 2001) is used by some groups for TEC modeling because of its improved performance in predicting the topside ionosphere (Nava et al, 2008).…”
Section: The Iri Modelmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…3 The analysis of the observed GPS TEC values in the close As it is known GPS TEC represents a measurement of TEC up to around 20000 km (height of the GPS satellites), including the ionospheric TEC (bottom and topside) and the plasmaspheric TEC. Nevertheless, previous studies (Belehaki et al, 2003(Belehaki et al, , 2004Mosert et al, 2007) that analyze the behaviour of TEC obtained by GPS observations and the ionospheric TEC obtained with the technique proposed by Huang and Reinisch (2001) show that the seasonal and solar activity variations of GPS TEC follow very well the corresponding ionospheric TEC variations. Figure 4 shows the comparison between the f o F 2 monthly median values for San Martin and the two options (URSI and CCIR) provided by the IRI model (Bilitza and Reinisch, 2008) to predict the density peak f o F 2 during a high solar activity year (2000).…”
Section: Behaviour Of Gps Tecmentioning
confidence: 99%