2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2020.104580
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparisons of heuristic, general statistical and machine learning models for landslide susceptibility prediction and mapping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
107
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 289 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
1
107
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The receiver operation characteristic (ROC) curve is a graphical representation of the relationship between the sensitivity and specificity of a laboratory test over all possible diagnostic cutoff values. It reflects the corrections between the "1-Specificity" Equation (4) and "Sensitivity" (equivalent to recall) [8]. We generally use the area under the ROC curve (AUC) to reflect the total accuracy of these models.…”
Section: Training Validation and Independent Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The receiver operation characteristic (ROC) curve is a graphical representation of the relationship between the sensitivity and specificity of a laboratory test over all possible diagnostic cutoff values. It reflects the corrections between the "1-Specificity" Equation (4) and "Sensitivity" (equivalent to recall) [8]. We generally use the area under the ROC curve (AUC) to reflect the total accuracy of these models.…”
Section: Training Validation and Independent Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many methodologies have been developed for landslide susceptibility mapping (LSM) based on remote sensing and GIS [8], including heuristic, general statistical and machine learning methods. Heuristic methods usually conducted by experts mainly include the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) [9], the expert knowledge system [10], and the gray relational method [8,11]. The experience of experts and their cognition to study site could greatly influence the LSM result.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When dealing with a specific landslide initiation process, complicated constitutive equations for slope materials and detailed boundary conditions are imperative in corresponding mathematical calculation procedures in understanding and modelling the triggering of a landslide process. When mapping regional landslide probability by using deterministic methods, several simplification procedures, including assumptions regarding homogeneous slopes and infinite slope patterns should be considered, for analyzing the slope stability [ 12 14 ]. Although explicit landslide triggering process can be well understood by using the numerical modelling methods, however, it is often difficult to acquire numerous parameters of each soil property under both saturated and unsaturated conditions in a wide area, and cumbersome computational procedures for solving a series of numerical models are time-consuming.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, for the intrinsic capability of mining valuable information hidden in records of real slope cases, machine learning algorithms, such as artificial neural network (ANN)-based [14][15][16][17][18][19], discriminant analysis-based [20][21][22], and decision tree-based approaches [23][24][25], have been applied to the evaluation of slope stability gradually. According to the potential failure mechanism, these methods evaluate slope stability based on the characteristics of the parameters, such as geotechnical parameters, slope geometry, and water condition, and the application of these machine learning algorithms can obtain reasonable results that can be used for the evaluation of slope stability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%