2004
DOI: 10.1007/bf02829164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparisons of constitutive models for anisotropic soils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The strain history dependency is therefore introduced into the kinematic hardening mechanism. Based on the work of Kim and introducing the state dependency via Been's parameter, in a similar way as in Maleki et al . , the evolution of the kinematic hardening variable η is defined by the following equation: dη=α1+eλκpitalicpaψs3pDdεqitalicpwhere α is a material constant.…”
Section: Model Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strain history dependency is therefore introduced into the kinematic hardening mechanism. Based on the work of Kim and introducing the state dependency via Been's parameter, in a similar way as in Maleki et al . , the evolution of the kinematic hardening variable η is defined by the following equation: dη=α1+eλκpitalicpaψs3pDdεqitalicpwhere α is a material constant.…”
Section: Model Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since modeling the full anisotropy of natural clay behavior is not practical due to the number of 30 parameters involved, efforts have been mainly focused on development of models with reduced number of 31 parameters while maintaining the capacity of the model [1]. Historically, for practical model development 32…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%