2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109667
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparisons of CO2 emission performance between secondary and service industries in Yangtze River Delta cities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Xiao et al revealed that the performance of the total-factor CO 2 emissions of the tertiary industry is better than that of the secondary industry. However, prospects for the low-carbon development of the tertiary industry, in the Yangtze River Delta, are not optimistic [37]. erefore, we propose Hypothesis 2.…”
Section: Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Xiao et al revealed that the performance of the total-factor CO 2 emissions of the tertiary industry is better than that of the secondary industry. However, prospects for the low-carbon development of the tertiary industry, in the Yangtze River Delta, are not optimistic [37]. erefore, we propose Hypothesis 2.…”
Section: Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Dong et al [ 22 ] developed a comprehensive system for assessing regional carbon emission efficiency and proved that the eastern region ranks highest and the Western lowest among China’s three major geographical regions. Xiao et al [ 23 ] investigated carbon emission performance in the Yangtze River Delta, revealing that upgrading the industrial structure is more carbon-friendly to the environment, especially the development of the tertiary industry. Shen et al [ 24 ] identified a number of unbalanced characteristics in industrial carbon efficiency, using a low-carbon transformation index from the perspective of regional and industrial disparity.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the above focus on environmental regulation, a number of scholars have also addressed the influencing factors driving green innovation efficiency from micro and macro perspectives. From the micro perspective, factors such as enterprise scale, the effects of technology introduction, capital density, the industry profit rate, the environmental protection awareness of senior executives, consumer orientation, etc., have all be considered [ 23 , 35 , 36 ]. From the micro perspective, factors such as urban scale, economic openness, R&D input intensity, FDI, the industrial structure, energy intensity, government quality, etc., have also been examined [ 37 ].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eco-efficiency, proposed by Schaltegger and Sturm (1990), is the ability to produce goods and services with minimal natural resource consumption and negative environmental impacts (Kuosmanen, 2005;Long et al, 2017;Oggioni et al, 2011). Improving the eco-efficiency in a precise manner provides a solution for this transformation towards sustainable development, as efficiency enhancement can mitigate the negative economic impact of emission constraints (Xiao et al, 2019b;Zhang et al, 2016a). To measure the eco-efficiency, data envelopment analysis (DEA) has attracted great attention based on a total-factor production process (Wang et al, 2016;Wu et al, 2020;Xiao et al, 2019b;Zhou et al, 2008a;Zhou and Ang, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%