Comparisons of Clinical Outcomes in Patients Transferred to Combined Therapy with Peritoneal Dialysis and Hemodialysis over those Directly Transferred to Hemodialysis: A Prospective Multicenter Study in Japan

Abstract

Background. Combined therapy with peritoneal dialysis (PD) and hemodialysis (HD) represents a treatment option for PD patients who cannot maintain adequacy of dialysis. Although several reports have indicated the clinical utility of combined therapy, most such studies have been small-scale, single-centered, retrospective and before-and-after test investigations lacking a control group. Methods. We conducted a prospective, multicenter, observational cohort study of 176 incident PD patients and compared patient survival and time-course changes in clinical parameters between patients switched from PD alone to combined therapy and patients switched directly to HD. Results. During a median follow-up of 41 months, 47 patients transferred to combined therapy and 35 patients transferred directly to HD. Among patients transferred to combined therapy, 66% transferred because of inadequate dialysis, and/or fluid overload, compared to only 29% among patients directly transferred to HD. Five patients died after transfer to HD alone, whereas 1 patient died after transfer to combined therapy. Although mortality was greater among patients transferred to HD directly than among patients transferred to combined therapy, this difference disappeared after matching for fluid overload and/or inadequate dialysis.Conclusion. This is the first report comparing clinical outcomes for patients on PD alone transferred to combined therapy with those for patients directly transferred to HD. Although comparison of patient survival was difficult because of the small number of deaths, PD patients suffering from inadequate dialysis and/or volume overload could clearly continue PD therapy safely by switching to combined therapy. Further study with a larger number of outcomes is needed.