2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-70289-2_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparisons of Aerodynamic Noise Results Between Computations and Experiments for a High-Speed Train Pantograph

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results for pantograph 1 are available at 273 km/h in both directions while for pantograph 2 measurements were made for speeds between 160 and 230 km/h and in both directions. Some of these measurement results have been presented in [41].…”
Section: Microphone Array Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Results for pantograph 1 are available at 273 km/h in both directions while for pantograph 2 measurements were made for speeds between 160 and 230 km/h and in both directions. Some of these measurement results have been presented in [41].…”
Section: Microphone Array Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure15: Noise maps over 400 to 4000 Hz for pantograph 2 at 226 km/h with knee-joint downstream (Top) and upstream (Bottom) (see also in[41]). Colour maps are to the same scale.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%