2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2005.05.051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparisons of activity measurements with radionuclide calibrators—A tool for quality assessment and improvement in nuclear medicine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of Cuba [29,30], a significant increase in the number of acceptable (within the 10% limits) results was observed between the trials carried out in 2000 and 2002, with the same (higher) level being maintained in a subsequent comparison in 2004. The comparisons in Cuba were carried out in the presence of the representative of the NMI, thus enabling obvious problems to be corrected in short fashion.…”
Section: National Comparisons For Clinicsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the case of Cuba [29,30], a significant increase in the number of acceptable (within the 10% limits) results was observed between the trials carried out in 2000 and 2002, with the same (higher) level being maintained in a subsequent comparison in 2004. The comparisons in Cuba were carried out in the presence of the representative of the NMI, thus enabling obvious problems to be corrected in short fashion.…”
Section: National Comparisons For Clinicsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Just as proficiency testing is important for manufacturers and commercial companies supplying radiopharmaceuticals, similar exercises are helpful in detecting problems with a measurement system at the clinical level. Within the last decade, measurement comparison tests for clinics have recently been organized at the national level and reported on by NMIs in Brazil, Cuba, the Czech Republic, India, the Republic of South Korea, Switzerland and the United Kingdom [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. In most cases, participation in such exercises is voluntary, although national legislation in Cuba and the Czech Republic make such tests mandatory.…”
Section: National Comparisons For Clinicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Curva representativa da sensibilidade da câmara de ionização para Curva representativa da sensibilidade da câmara de ionização para137 Cs e sua função ajustada FIGURA 33: Curva representativa da sensibilidade da câmara de ionização para241 Am e sua função ajustada40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 Altura da câmara de ionização (mm) Para a avaliação de um emissor , foi feita a opção pelo 241 Am, devido à necessidade de avalia-se a sensibilidade para emissores de baixa energia (59,5 keV) e também devido à quantidade de fontes provenientes de detectores de fumaça (DF) e de pára-raios radioativos (PRR), pois, atualmente a GRR mantém armazenadas cerca de 120.000 fontes provenientes de PRR removidas desse tipo de captor. Para a avaliação foi utilizada uma FRS com cerca de 11,1 GBq, que é apresentada na FIG.…”
unclassified
“…de todas as fontes de incertezas que possam contribuir para a realização de uma determinada medição ou conjunto de medições. Essas fontes podem originar incertezas do tipo A e B, que são então correlacionadas por uma , onde as incertezas envolvidas são aceitáveis para essa aplicação[38,39,40,41,42].Com base nesses fatores, foram selecionadas algumas FRS, emissoras alfa, beta e gama, mais utilizadas na pesquisa, medicina e indústria e cujos RN representassem maior fração no inventário de FRS recebidas pela GRR.…”
unclassified