1984
DOI: 10.1086/190948
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparisons of a standard galaxy model with stellar observations in five fields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
124
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 160 publications
(136 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
12
124
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The expected contamination of our sample due to Milky Way foreground stars is negligible; generic star-count models (e.g., Bahcall & Soneira 1984), as well as direct star counts from the Hubble Deep Field and Medium Deep Fields (e.g., Santiago et al 1996;Mendez et al 1996), predict that we should expect to see less than one foreground star with I < 26 mag within the HRC field size of 0.2 arcmin 2 . Similarly, the galaxy counts from the Hubble Deep Field (Williams et al 1996) suggest we should see at most six galaxies with I < 26 mag in our field.…”
Section: Observations and Data Reductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The expected contamination of our sample due to Milky Way foreground stars is negligible; generic star-count models (e.g., Bahcall & Soneira 1984), as well as direct star counts from the Hubble Deep Field and Medium Deep Fields (e.g., Santiago et al 1996;Mendez et al 1996), predict that we should expect to see less than one foreground star with I < 26 mag within the HRC field size of 0.2 arcmin 2 . Similarly, the galaxy counts from the Hubble Deep Field (Williams et al 1996) suggest we should see at most six galaxies with I < 26 mag in our field.…”
Section: Observations and Data Reductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…This is certainly a reasonable assumption for small z, although there is no reason why the galactic disk should be isothermal at all. Bahcall (1984b) (but see also Bahcall 1984a;Bahcall & Soneira 1984) treated the problem assuming that non isothermality can be simulated by the superposition of more isothermal components. The observations of Kuijken & Gilmore (1989b) (Kuijken & Gilmore 1989a,c) show significant departures from isothermality at large z.…”
Section: Non-isothermal Profile Of the Galactic Disksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the Milky Way. A major advancement of these techniques was achieved by Bahcall & Soneira (1984) who applied the concept of stellar populations to the solar neighbourhood (see also Bahcall 1984a,b) and nowadays, more theoretically sophisticated star-count models are the standard tools to investigate the MW stellar distribution (e.g., the Besançon model, Robin et al 2003). The ultimate step toward the understanding of our Galaxy is thus represented by the extension of the concept of stellar populations to include kinematics, dynamics, photometric and chemical properties together in a global MW modelling approach (e.g., Méndez et al 2000;Vallenari et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The former group of stars includes the prominent peak associated with the giant southern stream and is roughly centered on M31's systemic velocity of À300 km s À1 ; they are therefore designated ''candidate M31 RGB stars.'' The latter group of stars occupies the radial velocity range predicted by the Institute for Advanced Study Galaxy (IASG) star-count model (RG02; Bahcall & Soneira 1984;Ratnatunga & Bahcall 1985); they are therefore designated ''candidate Galactic dwarf stars.'' We now test the validity of these designations by comparing the properties of these two groups of stars.…”
Section: Radial Velocitymentioning
confidence: 99%