2000
DOI: 10.1378/chest.118.4.1127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparisons Between Sublingual and Gastric Tonometry During Hemorrhagic Shock

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
2
3

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
35
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…These authors have demonstrated an increase in sublingual PCO 2 (PslCO 2 ) that was closely related to decreases in arterial pressure and cardiac index during circulatory shock produced by hemorrhage and sepsis . [35,[88][89][90]. Furthermore, the increase in PslCO 2 closely tracked the increase in PimCO 2 .…”
Section: Sublingual Capnometrymentioning
confidence: 63%
“…These authors have demonstrated an increase in sublingual PCO 2 (PslCO 2 ) that was closely related to decreases in arterial pressure and cardiac index during circulatory shock produced by hemorrhage and sepsis . [35,[88][89][90]. Furthermore, the increase in PslCO 2 closely tracked the increase in PimCO 2 .…”
Section: Sublingual Capnometrymentioning
confidence: 63%
“…In animals, ileum has been used to assess splanchnic perfusion [25,36] – a clinically impractical procedure. Studies have demonstrated that sublingual capnometry, a relatively noninvasive procedure, correlates with gastric tonometry [26,40,41,42]. Practically, it may be difficult to lodge the sensor securely under the tongue in uncooperative patients, thereby preventing equilibration with tissue P CO 2 [27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[34], interest turned to the capnometric monitoring at other sites of the gastrointestinal mucosa. In the last decades, several investigators have reported a correlation between the PCO 2 values of the oral and gastric mucosa in different pathological conditions [35,36] and has resulted in the use of sublingual or buccal mucosal capnometry. These methods do not have the limitations of gastric tonometry and are increasingly used for the measurement of PCO 2 in the mucosa, and the calculation of mucosal-to-arterial PCO 2 gap [3,37].…”
Section: The Correlation Between Gastric Mucosal Perfusion and Emptyimentioning
confidence: 99%