2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.10.052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparisons between MgH2- and LiH-containing systems for hydrogen storage applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

4
21
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
4
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The unmodified mixture lost a total of 10.94 wt% during decomposition, which is significantly higher than the theoretical hydrogen capacity of 8.14 wt%. This increase is attributed to release of ammonia from the decomposition of unreacted LiNH 2 and the slow reaction kinetics between MgH 2 and NH 3 [17,18].…”
Section: Decomposition Of the Modified And Unmodified Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The unmodified mixture lost a total of 10.94 wt% during decomposition, which is significantly higher than the theoretical hydrogen capacity of 8.14 wt%. This increase is attributed to release of ammonia from the decomposition of unreacted LiNH 2 and the slow reaction kinetics between MgH 2 and NH 3 [17,18].…”
Section: Decomposition Of the Modified And Unmodified Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through the use of Draeger tubes on the 2:1 LiNH 2 :MgH 2 system, Luo et al showed that ammonia concentration was strongly dependent on the desorption temperature with concentrations of 180ppm measured at 180°C and 720ppm at 240°C [17]. In a separate analysis, the effect of milling duration on ammonia release from the 2:1 mixture during heating was investigated, resulting in over 30 ppm/mg for unmilled samples and under 10 ppm/mg fo samples milled for 180 minutes using high-energy milling [18]. In a separate study on the effect of the variation of LiH composition in the Mg(NH 2 ) 2 -LiH mixture, Hu et al observed that if the molar ratio of LiH was below 2, ammonia evolution occurred during dehydrogenation reactions and if the molar ratio was above 2 a reduction in hydrogen storage efficiency was observed [19].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the ammonia release from the Spex milled sample peaked at 285 °C. The source of ammonia can be attributed to the decomposition of unreacted LiNH 2 , the slow reaction kinetics between MgH 2 and NH 3 from decomposing LiNH 2 [12,33,34] and/or the decomposition of Mg(NH 2 ) 2 , which runs parallel to the H 2 desorption of the hydride-amide system [35]. Janot et al showed that a mixture of 2:1 LiNH 2 :MgH 2 lost significantly more weight than a 2:1 LiH:Mg(NH 2 ) 2 at 200 °C into primary vacuum due to ammonia release [12].…”
Section: Decomposition Behavior Of Unmodified As-milled Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results indicate that the NH 3 concentration is around 180 ppm at 180 • C and 720 ppm at 240 • C, restricting the cycling and then the applicability. Markmaitree et al [57] compared the reaction kinetics and the NH 3 emission of the 2LiNH 2 + MgH 2 and LiNH 2 + LiH systems. The 2LiNH 2 + MgH 2 mixture seems to possess a higher activation energy and NH 3 emission than the LiNH 2 + LiH mixture.…”
Section: Li-mg-n-h Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnesium amide forms and then decomposes to MgNH at a reasonable rate from 250 • C with the release of NH 3 [57]. Further ammonia is produced in the last step, then reacts with residual MgH 2 and the reaction cycle continues.…”
Section: Li-mg-n-h Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%