2008
DOI: 10.3354/dao01914
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparisons among the complete genomes of four betanodavirus genotypes

Abstract: Betanodaviruses, the causative agents of viral nervous necrosis in marine fish, have bipartite positive-sense RNA genomes and have been classified (based on analysis of RNA2 sequences) into 4 genotypes: tiger puffer nervous necrosis virus (TPNNV), barfin flounder nervous necrosis virus (BFNNV), striped jack nervous necrosis virus (SJNNV), and redspotted grouper nervous necrosis virus (RGNNV). Full-length genomes of TPNNV and BFNNV were sequenced for the first time in this study. Their sequence data and those o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The evolutionary distances were computed using the Kimura 2-parameter method [26] and are in the units of the number of base substitutions per site [27][28][29][30]. GenBank accession numbers and references for nucleotide sequences are as follow: EU826138.1 [31], EF617326 [32], NC_013461 [33], KF386164 [34], KY354698.1 [35], GU826692.1 [36], HE796793.1 [37], KY354694.1 [35], HE796789.1 [37], HE796797.1 [37], HE796788.1 [37], HE796791.1 [37], HE796790.1 [37], HE796785.1 [37], HE796798.1 [37], HE796799.1 [37], HE796794.1 [37], HE796786.1 [37], AJ698093.1 [38], AF318942.1 [39], AF499774.1 [40], HE796795.1 [37], HE796796.1 [37], HE796787.1 [37], HE796784 [37], KM588181.1 [41], KP455642.1 [42], AY284968.1 [43], HE796792.1 [37], JN190021.1 [44].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evolutionary distances were computed using the Kimura 2-parameter method [26] and are in the units of the number of base substitutions per site [27][28][29][30]. GenBank accession numbers and references for nucleotide sequences are as follow: EU826138.1 [31], EF617326 [32], NC_013461 [33], KF386164 [34], KY354698.1 [35], GU826692.1 [36], HE796793.1 [37], KY354694.1 [35], HE796789.1 [37], HE796797.1 [37], HE796788.1 [37], HE796791.1 [37], HE796790.1 [37], HE796785.1 [37], HE796798.1 [37], HE796799.1 [37], HE796794.1 [37], HE796786.1 [37], AJ698093.1 [38], AF318942.1 [39], AF499774.1 [40], HE796795.1 [37], HE796796.1 [37], HE796787.1 [37], HE796784 [37], KM588181.1 [41], KP455642.1 [42], AY284968.1 [43], HE796792.1 [37], JN190021.1 [44].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the different species of betanodaviruses, amino acid sequences of RdRp protein and capsid protein share 87–99% and 77–100% of identity, respectively [82–98% for the complete RNA1 nucleic sequence and 76–99% for the RNA2 segment (Okinaka & Nakai )]. The topology of phylogenetic trees based on RNA1 and RNA2 distinguishes several clades, suggesting a high diversity despite relatively strong purifying selection on most codons (Panzarin et al .…”
Section: Nervous Necrosis Virusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, KSNNV‐KOR1 appears to be an ancient member of the Betanodavirus , as it forms a group in a primitive branch extending distantly from all the other previously reported betanodaviruses in both phylogenetic trees for RNA1 and RNA2 (Figure c,d). In the same point of view, KSNNV may have evolved via reshuffling events between RNA1 and RNA2 of different genotypes based on the cross‐similarity of segments including BFNNV‐SJNNV in RNA1, and RGNNV‐BFNNV and SJNNV‐TPNNV in RNA2 (Dalla Valle et al, ; Okinaka & Nakai, ). In addition, both the gap regions of 2 aa in ORF and 21 nt in 3′‐UTR in RNA2 (aa236–aa237 of ORF and nt1122–nt1142 of 3′‐UTR in KSNNV‐KOR1 RNA2) were used to determine the RGNNV‐BFNNV and SJNNV‐TPNNV sister relationship (Okinaka & Nakai, ; Figures and ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the same point of view, KSNNV may have evolved via reshuffling events between RNA1 and RNA2 of different genotypes based on the cross‐similarity of segments including BFNNV‐SJNNV in RNA1, and RGNNV‐BFNNV and SJNNV‐TPNNV in RNA2 (Dalla Valle et al, ; Okinaka & Nakai, ). In addition, both the gap regions of 2 aa in ORF and 21 nt in 3′‐UTR in RNA2 (aa236–aa237 of ORF and nt1122–nt1142 of 3′‐UTR in KSNNV‐KOR1 RNA2) were used to determine the RGNNV‐BFNNV and SJNNV‐TPNNV sister relationship (Okinaka & Nakai, ; Figures and ). Interestingly, KSNNV‐KOR1 contained extra sequences at the two gap regions in RNA2 (aa236–aa237 of ORF and nt1122–nt1142 of 3′‐UTR in KSNNV‐KOR1 RNA2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%