Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference (APSIPA), 2014 Asia-Pacific 2014
DOI: 10.1109/apsipa.2014.7041795
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison the training methods of neural network for English and Thai character recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They were able to achieve approximately 97% of recognition rate. For English language also, due to its widespread usage and commercial usability, Zhu and Wang (2002) [21], Dhande and Kharat (2017a) [22], Pal et al (2006) [23], Dhande and Kharat (2017b) [24], and Saenthon and Sukkhadamrongrak (2014) [25] proposed few approaches for character recognition. Font recognition was done by using a wide array of techniques and they were able to achieve a satisfactory accuracy on text blocks.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They were able to achieve approximately 97% of recognition rate. For English language also, due to its widespread usage and commercial usability, Zhu and Wang (2002) [21], Dhande and Kharat (2017a) [22], Pal et al (2006) [23], Dhande and Kharat (2017b) [24], and Saenthon and Sukkhadamrongrak (2014) [25] proposed few approaches for character recognition. Font recognition was done by using a wide array of techniques and they were able to achieve a satisfactory accuracy on text blocks.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%