2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-10783-7_13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison Study of Robotic Middleware for Robotic Applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have compared the techniques used in traditional blackboard systems and messaging systems (Orebäck and Christensen, 2003;Magyar et al, 2015;Matamoros et al, 2015). This research concludes that blackboard architectures are easier to maintain and provide greater performance than peer-to-peer systems.…”
Section: Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Previous studies have compared the techniques used in traditional blackboard systems and messaging systems (Orebäck and Christensen, 2003;Magyar et al, 2015;Matamoros et al, 2015). This research concludes that blackboard architectures are easier to maintain and provide greater performance than peer-to-peer systems.…”
Section: Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Quando comparado a outras plataformas, o ROS se destaca por apresentar um elevado número de componentes e suportar o maior número de robôs (Magyar et al, 2015), além de contar com uma ampla e crescente comunidade de usuários contribuindo para a sua expansão, contribuindo assim para o compartilhamento e reuso de códigos (Staranowicz and Mariottini, 2011).…”
Section: Robot Operating System (Ros)unclassified
“…Several works suggest a structured approach to the control of robots, including middleware (Magyar et al, 2015), frameworks, and architectures. In this section, we discuss those that are most closely related to our proposal.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%