2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.08.093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison study of electrocatalytic activity of reduced graphene oxide supported Pt–Cu bimetallic or Pt nanoparticles for the electrooxidation of methanol and ethanol

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An important factor that has been using in the evaluation of the electrocatalyst is the tolerance to CO poison species formed during the MOR [14]. To determine the tolerance to the accumulation of carbonaceous species, were used the criterion of the ratio of the peak current in the forward sweep (If) and the peak current in the reverse sweep (Ib) [15], [16]. A higher value of the If/Ib ratio better oxidation of methanol and less poisoning of the electrocatalysts by the CO species are obtained [17].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important factor that has been using in the evaluation of the electrocatalyst is the tolerance to CO poison species formed during the MOR [14]. To determine the tolerance to the accumulation of carbonaceous species, were used the criterion of the ratio of the peak current in the forward sweep (If) and the peak current in the reverse sweep (Ib) [15], [16]. A higher value of the If/Ib ratio better oxidation of methanol and less poisoning of the electrocatalysts by the CO species are obtained [17].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current for methanol electrooxidation showed a rapid decay in the initial period for Pt/Cu-ZEA/RGO, Pt/ZEA/RGO and Pt/RGO electrodes, which was due to the formation of intermediate species during the methanol oxidation reaction, such as CO ads , CHO ads , etc. [55] The result showed that the current of Pt/Cu-ZEA/RGO, Pt/ZEA/RGO and Pt/RGO electrodes was reduced to 47.18%, 26.00% and 7.89% of the initial current after 2000 s, respectively. Furthermore, the Pt/Cu-ZEA/RGO electrode maintained a higher current, and its final current was around 40.67 mA/mg after 2000 s for methanol oxidation, which was about 2.9 and 13.56 times higher than that of Pt/ZEA/RGO and Pt/RGO electrodes, respectively.…”
Section: Electrochemical Performances Of As-prepared Electrodesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…2a, the XRD pattern for the Pt/C electrocatalyst exhibited peaks at 2h = 39.5, 45.9, 67.34, and 81.34°, which are characteristic of a face-centered cubic structure for Pt and corresponds to its (1 1 1), (2 0 0), (2 2 0), and (3 1 1) planes, respectively [24][25][26]. But for the XRD pattern of the Cu@Pt/C electrocatalyst, the characteristic peaks of a face-centered cubic structure for Pt show a shifting toward higher 2h values, being 2h = 40.87, 47.22, 69.54, and 83.98°, which correspond to its (1 1 1), (2 0 0), (2 2 0), and (3 1 1) planes, respectively [27,28]. The same behavior appeared in the XRD pattern of Cu@Pd when it was compared with commercial Pd/C.…”
Section: Physicochemical Characterization Of Cu@pd/c and Cu@pt C Elecmentioning
confidence: 99%