2017 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/ultsym.2017.8091554
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison study of displacement estimation methods for microwave ablation procedures using electrode displacement elastography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6. Higher CNR values indicate improved mass detectability (Varghese and Ophir 1998; Pohlman et al 2017). In Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6. Higher CNR values indicate improved mass detectability (Varghese and Ophir 1998; Pohlman et al 2017). In Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The final displacement vector is the sum of the integer and subsample displacements. CSDE was utilized to process EDE data sets on human subjects reported in (Pohlman et al 2017). An initial kernel size of 7.5 wavelengths x 29 A-lines was used, with a final kernel of 1 wavelength x 3 A lines, also used for CSDE in this paper.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After displacement was denoised via dictionary representation, the inclusion was visualized from strain tensor images calculated using a least-squares method after filtering and dictionary denoising [28]. Denoised strain tensor images were compared to strain tensor images after median filtering and spline smoothening [72, 73]. In the interest of quantifying strain tensors from initial displacement maps and displacement maps represented by a sparse set of dictionary patches, we utilized similar region-of-interest (ROI) as used in [20].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We then calculated the following three quantitative metrics shown in Eqn. (5), (6), and (7), namely the SNR, contrast, and CNR [72, 73] SNR=trues¯IσI Contrast=trues¯Btrues¯I CNR=2(trues¯Itrues¯B)2(σI2+σB2) where I and B refer to the inside and background ROIs respectfully, and trueS¯ and σ are the mean and standard deviation of strain tensor magnitudes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%