2018
DOI: 10.1109/tvt.2017.2759910
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison Study Between PD-NOMA and SCMA

Abstract: Abstract-In this paper, the performance and system complexity of the candidate multiple access (MA) techniques for the next generation of cellular systems, namely, non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) (in this paper, we consider power domain MA as NOMA) and sparse code multiple access (SCMA), are investigated. To this end, for each MA technique, a resource allocation problem considering heterogeneous cellular networks (HetNet) is formulated. We apply successive convex approximation (SCA) method to each proble… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
86
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
86
0
Order By: Relevance
“…NOMA has been integrated into the third‐generation partnership project long‐term evolution (3GPP‐LTE) and digital TV standard ATSC 3.0 as multi‐user superposition transmission (MUST) and layered division multiplexing (LDM) technique, respectively . Power domain NOMA system is more compatible in spectral efficiency compared with sparse code NOMA and orthogonal multiple access (OMA) technique . In power domain NOMA, multiple users are paired based on the difference in channel conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…NOMA has been integrated into the third‐generation partnership project long‐term evolution (3GPP‐LTE) and digital TV standard ATSC 3.0 as multi‐user superposition transmission (MUST) and layered division multiplexing (LDM) technique, respectively . Power domain NOMA system is more compatible in spectral efficiency compared with sparse code NOMA and orthogonal multiple access (OMA) technique . In power domain NOMA, multiple users are paired based on the difference in channel conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Power domain NOMA system is more compatible in spectral efficiency compared with sparse code NOMA and orthogonal multiple access (OMA) technique. [5][6][7] In power domain NOMA, multiple users are paired based on the difference in channel conditions. In a downlink two-user scenario, more power is allocated to far user (FU), and less power is allocated to near user (NU).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…M On the other side, to meet the spectrum efficiency demands of data hungry services in 5G, new transmission techniques are under-investigated where non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) techniques are one of the promising approaches here [3]. On of the interesting NOMA techniques to address the mentioned challenges is sparse code multiple access (SCMA) which can enhance the system performance compared to the other access techniques [4], [5]. By applying the SCMA, each subcarrier can be reused more than one time in the coverage area of radio remote head (RRH).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scrambling‐based NOMA uses different scrambling code for each user and adopts repetition coding or channel coding for multiuser signal decoding. A special case of scrambling‐based NOMA called power domain NOMA (PDNOMA) scheme with all “1” scrambling code is investigated in literature . The power difference between the near and far users due to near far effect is utilized to share the same resource block by multiple users.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A special case of scrambling-based NOMA called power domain NOMA (PDNOMA) scheme with all "1" scrambling code is investigated in literature. 3 The power difference between the near and far users due to near far effect is utilized to share the same resource block by multiple users. Superposition coding at the transmitter and successive interference cancellation (SIC) at the receiver are used in the PDNOMA.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%