2017 IEEE International Conference on Electrical, Instrumentation and Communication Engineering (ICEICE) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/iceice.2017.8191924
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison on 6T, 5T and 4T SRAM cell using 22nm technology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• Architectural variations: Manufactures may optimize the SRAM structure in different ways to support the requirement [42]- [45]. Among different structures, the symmetric 6-Transistor (6T) SRAM structure is the most common one (Fig.…”
Section: A Sources Of Distinguishable Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…• Architectural variations: Manufactures may optimize the SRAM structure in different ways to support the requirement [42]- [45]. Among different structures, the symmetric 6-Transistor (6T) SRAM structure is the most common one (Fig.…”
Section: A Sources Of Distinguishable Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, to suppress the noise (e.g., read disturbance, half-select disturbance, etc. ), other SRAM architecture such as 5T, asymmetric 6T, 7T, 8T, 9T, 10T structure is also available [42]- [45]. However, due to these configurations' asymmetric structure, each SRAM cell on the memory array may be biased to a specific logic at start-up.…”
Section: A Sources Of Distinguishable Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%