1982
DOI: 10.1071/ch9821311
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of σ-acyl and σ-perfluoroacyl groups as ligands: Crystal and molecular structures of the platinum(II) complexes trans-PtCl(COR)(PMePh2)2 (R = Me,CF3)

Abstract: Crystal and molecular structures of the title compounds have been determined from three dimensional X-ray diffraction data recorded on a four-circle diffractometer. Crystals of the acetyl complex, trans-PtCl(COMe)(PMePh2)2,(1), are monoclinic, space group P2,1/c, with a 12.9709(5), b 11.1024(5), c 277535(9) Ǻ, β 94.75(1)° and Z 6. Crystals of the trifluoroacetyl complex, trans-PtCl(COCF3)- (PMePh2)2, (2), are monoclinic, space group P21/n (non-standard setting of P21c), with a 11.4246(7), b 15.5750(7), c 15.42… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
0
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The crystal structure of 3 shows the expected square planar geometry at platinum; the angles around the metal center range from 89.70(6)° to 90.6(2)°. The structure is similar to that of the related complex trans -Pt(PPh 2 Me) 2 (COCF 3 )(Cl) . The Pt−Cl, Pt−C(O), and carbonyl bond lengths for 3 (2.402(2), 1.990(7), and 1.191(9) Å, respectively) are the same within experimental error as those in the trifluoroacyl complex (2.390(1), 2.028(6), and 1.210(5) Å).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…The crystal structure of 3 shows the expected square planar geometry at platinum; the angles around the metal center range from 89.70(6)° to 90.6(2)°. The structure is similar to that of the related complex trans -Pt(PPh 2 Me) 2 (COCF 3 )(Cl) . The Pt−Cl, Pt−C(O), and carbonyl bond lengths for 3 (2.402(2), 1.990(7), and 1.191(9) Å, respectively) are the same within experimental error as those in the trifluoroacyl complex (2.390(1), 2.028(6), and 1.210(5) Å).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…The major difference, as expected, is in the Rh−C bond length, with the acyl complex having the shorter bond (1.946 vs 2.014 Å). This trend is in agreement with two previously reported pairs of perfluoroacyl and perfluoroalkyl complexes of rhodium and platinum but is in contrast to our results with cobalt, where the Co−C bond length of the trifluoromethyl complex was shorter than that of the trifluoroacetyl complex . On the other hand, the Rh−C bond length for the acetyl complex reported by Moloy and Petersen (1.981 Å) is, as expected, significantly longer than the trifluoroacetyl bond length of 1 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%