2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2018.02.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of δ18O analyses on individual planktic foraminifer (Orbulina universa) shells by SIMS and gas-source mass spectrometry

Abstract: Isotope ratio mass spectrometry Planktic foraminifera GSMS = 0), and confirms that SIMS-based foraminifer δ 18 O values record changes in calcification temperature and/or δ 18 O of seawater. Whether shells of foraminifer taxa with differing microcrystalline structures, chemical composition, and/or preservation histories register a similar Δ 18 O SIMS-GSMS value is a subject of ongoing testing.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
38
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
4
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(c) Highly magnified image (scale bar = 10 μm) of penultimate chamber in cross section showing 10‐μm secondary ion mass spectrometry analysis pits and corresponding δ 18 O values (‰, Vienna Peedee Belemnite). Note: δ 18 O values have been adjusted (+0.9‰) using correction determined by Wycech et al () and gametogenic calcite outlined with yellow dashed line.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(c) Highly magnified image (scale bar = 10 μm) of penultimate chamber in cross section showing 10‐μm secondary ion mass spectrometry analysis pits and corresponding δ 18 O values (‰, Vienna Peedee Belemnite). Note: δ 18 O values have been adjusted (+0.9‰) using correction determined by Wycech et al () and gametogenic calcite outlined with yellow dashed line.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quality of individual analyses on T . sacculifer shells was assessed on the basis of the visual appearance of the pit (Wycech et al, ) and the secondary 16 O − ion yield (ion count rate/primary beam current) relative to the standard (see section S2 for quality control details). Whenever possible, discrete SIMS δ 18 O measurements were performed on the PREGAM (three to four pits per shell) and GAM (one to two pits per shell) calcites of the same shell (Figure c).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interestingly, the weakest correlation is observed between the stable isotope data of G. truncatulinoides and both MFI‐based percent dissolved and ΔCO 3 2− (Table ). This is noteworthy because this species is purported to have heterogeneous test geochemistry with regard to stable isotopes and the parts of the shell with greater concentrations of 16 O are expected to dissolve (Lohmann, ), similar to a mixed layer foraminifer, Globigerinoides sacculifer (Wycech et al, ), rendering δ 18 O values larger as ΔCO 3 2− decreases.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, no dissolution effect on δ 18 O and δ 13 C data from N. dutertrei tests was observed in core tops from the eastern equatorial Pacific (Mekik, ). If dissolution in sediments removes 16 O due to shell heterogeneity, then we would expect the δ 18 O values to increase in the positive direction as percent calcite dissolved increases (Wycech et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%