2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.12.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of zone 3 Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta and the Abdominal Aortic and Junctional Tourniquet in a model of junctional hemorrhage in swine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is an advantage over other point-of-injury devices, such as abdominal aortic junctional tourniquet, which is designed to create a zone 3 occlusion and has only been compared with REBOA for such. [24][25][26] While there were no significant differences in survival between the REBOA and GROA groups, it is important to note that both devices were preplaced prior to hemorrhage. The GROA device is envisioned to be placed similar to an orogastric tube.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is an advantage over other point-of-injury devices, such as abdominal aortic junctional tourniquet, which is designed to create a zone 3 occlusion and has only been compared with REBOA for such. [24][25][26] While there were no significant differences in survival between the REBOA and GROA groups, it is important to note that both devices were preplaced prior to hemorrhage. The GROA device is envisioned to be placed similar to an orogastric tube.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are of course invasive methods of arresting ‘non-compressible’ haemorrhage such as resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA),19 20 but this is not a CMT-delivered intervention 5 6 21. The American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma and the American College of Emergency Physicians state that REBOA should only be deployed when an acute care surgeon is immediately available 21.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst the AAJT has potential physiological consequences of prolonged application, it can be applied rapidly and would rarely delay transport to a trauma centre, whilst delivering equivalent aortic occlusion to zone 3 REBOA with a similar physiological profile. 5 Brannstrom and colleagues demonstrated that transition from AAJT to zone 3 REBOA is possible, 17 and adoption of both strategies would enable pre-hospital teams to minimise scene and transport time by applying the AAJT, with trauma centres transitioning to REBOA in ED or the OT. In our system the use of prehospital REBOA should also be explored but the greatest benefit is likely to arise from decreasing the time to intervention in exsanguinating patients by adopting more effective, evidence-based dispatch strategies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 The Abdominal Aortic and Junctional Tourniquet (AAJT) (Compression Works LLC, Birmingham, AL, United States) provides external aortic compression. It is a belt-like device with an inflatable bladder that when applied to the abdomen at the level of the umbilicus delivers sufficient external pressure to the distal aorta to cease flow through the femoral arteries, 4 requires minimal training, takes 60À90 s to apply, 5 and has been shown in animal models to increase systemic vascular resistance, Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP), carotid blood flow, and increase the rate of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) in hypovolaemic TCA. 6À8 There is only one previously reported case of use of the AAJT in TCA; a pulseless combat casualty in Afghanistan with return of palpable pulse and increase in end tidal carbon dioxide (etCO 2 ) in the setting of lower limb exsanguination 9 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%