1987
DOI: 10.1177/154193128703100515
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Workload Measures on Computer—Generated Primary Flight Displays

Abstract: Four Air Force pilots were used as subjects to assess a battery of subjective and physiological workload measures in a flight simulation environment in which two computer-generated primary flight display configurations were evaluated. A high- and low-workload task was created by manipulating flight path complexity. Both SWAT and the NASA-TLX were shown to be effective in differentiating the high and low workload path conditions. Physiological measures were inconclusive. A battery of workload measures continues… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
5

Year Published

1988
1988
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
10
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Using a computer game representing a complex decision-making environment, we concurrently measured subjective workload and performance at regular intervals preceding and following shifts in task demand. A single-item, global measure of subjective workload was used because (a) such measures are equally if not more sensitive to different levels of subjective workload when compared to multi-item measures (Eggemeier, Shingledecker, & Crabtree, 1985;Hill, Zaklad, Bittner, Byers, & Christ, 1988;Nataupsky & Abbott, 1987;Verwey & Veltman, 1996;Vidulich & Bortolussi, 1988;Vidulich & Tsang, 1987), and (b) they are less disruptive to performance when administered during task execution (Tsang & Vidulich, 1994). On the basis of the proposition that individuals experience different control states depending on shifts in task demand and workload history, we expected subjective workload's relationship with performance to be more dynamic, changing in both magnitude and direction, at the within-versus the betweenperson level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using a computer game representing a complex decision-making environment, we concurrently measured subjective workload and performance at regular intervals preceding and following shifts in task demand. A single-item, global measure of subjective workload was used because (a) such measures are equally if not more sensitive to different levels of subjective workload when compared to multi-item measures (Eggemeier, Shingledecker, & Crabtree, 1985;Hill, Zaklad, Bittner, Byers, & Christ, 1988;Nataupsky & Abbott, 1987;Verwey & Veltman, 1996;Vidulich & Bortolussi, 1988;Vidulich & Tsang, 1987), and (b) they are less disruptive to performance when administered during task execution (Tsang & Vidulich, 1994). On the basis of the proposition that individuals experience different control states depending on shifts in task demand and workload history, we expected subjective workload's relationship with performance to be more dynamic, changing in both magnitude and direction, at the within-versus the betweenperson level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…상황인식의 정의에 대한 논의는 여러 가지가 주장되었으 나 (Endsley, 1988a;Fracker, 1988 (Shively et al, 1987;Nataupsky & Abbott, 1987;Battiste & Bortolussi, 1988;Tsang & Johnson, 1989), 전투기에 의한 고공 전투 Bittner et al, 1989), 원격 제어차량 운전 , 시뮬레이터를 이용한 원 전 운전 (Drøivoldsmo et al, 1998;Sebok, 2000;Braarud, 2000;Braarud & Brendryen, 2001 …”
Section: 상황인식unclassified
“…− In a flight simulator piloting tasks with different levels of complexity were carried out for the evaluation of cockpit displays. Significant differences were obtained with NASA-TLX and SWAT but not with physiological measurement methods (Nataupsky and Abbott, 1987). − Flights with and without system failures were carried out in a Boeing 727 flight simulator.…”
Section: Validity Of the Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Representative applications (e.g., Corwin et al, 1989;Hughes et al, 1990;Nataupsky and Abbott,1987;Ward and Hassoun, 1990) have demonstrated the sensitivity of SWAT to different demand manipulations in the flight environment and are representative of results that have been obtained with SWAT in other systems, such as military tanks (Whitaker et al, 1989). Likewise, TLX sensitivity has been demonstrated in many flight experiments that incorporated different demand manipulations (e.g., Battiste and Bortolussi,1988;Corwin et al,1989;Nataupsky and Abbott, 1987;Shively et al, 1987;Tsang and Johnson, 1989;Vidulich and Bortolussi, 1988). All three measures and the Overall Workload Scale (Vidulich and Tsang, 1987) have also been applied to derive an index of operator workload which proved sensitive to several variables in a series of evaluations conducted within U.S. Army systems (e.g., remotely piloted vehicle, mobile air defence) under various test conditions Hill et al, 1988).…”
Section: Mental Workload Measurement In a Test And Evaluation Environmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation