2009
DOI: 10.1063/1.3153903
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of wind power estimates from the ECMWF reanalyses with direct turbine measurements

Abstract: Reanalysis data are rarely used for wind power estimates because of the limited spatial and temporal resolution. Here we report on a detailed comparison of wind speed and electric power time series recorded at a continental location in Hungary and estimates provided by the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts ͑ECMWF͒ ERA-40 and Interim databases at nearby grid points. The results show that the temporal behavior is adequately represented in reanalysis records with damped magnitudes, as expected. H… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most interesting are studies where the resulting wind power time series have been compared against historical records. Kiss et al [8] appears to be first to compared nacelle measurements of wind speed and power generation from two turbines in Hungary to the ERA-40 reanalysis data set. They found a "satisfying agreement" with proper calibration of the conversion model.…”
Section: Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most interesting are studies where the resulting wind power time series have been compared against historical records. Kiss et al [8] appears to be first to compared nacelle measurements of wind speed and power generation from two turbines in Hungary to the ERA-40 reanalysis data set. They found a "satisfying agreement" with proper calibration of the conversion model.…”
Section: Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both ERAInterim (Dee et al, 2011) and NCEP (Kalnay et al, 1996) reanalyses cover the whole period 1997-2007 for which VGV data are available to calibrate the loss functions (see Sect. 3.1).…”
Section: Meteorological Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to geographic constraints in the Carpathian basin, Hungary is not very rich in wind energy [7][8][9][10][11][12], and electricity production is extremely intermittent at each site (see Figure 2). Typical capacity factors (the ratio of mean and rated output power) at working turbines hardly exceed 25%, particular values are at K: 19.92% ± 23.71%, 17.42% ± 22.61%, 20.89% ± 24.98%; at M 1: 20.76% ± 11.55%, 22.33% ± 12.58%, 20.27% ± 11.24%; and at M 2: 21.26% ± 11.66%, 23.16% ± 12.24%, 21.55%±11.58% in three consecutive full years shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: M2mentioning
confidence: 99%