2002
DOI: 10.1002/ana.10121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of weakness progression in inclusion body myositis during treatment with methotrexate or placebo

Abstract: We investigated whether 5 to 20mg per week oral methotrexate could slow down disease progression in 44 patients with inclusion body myositis in a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study over 48 weeks. Mean change of quantitative muscle strength testing sum scores was the primary study outcome measure. Quantitative muscle strength testing sum scores declined in both treatment groups, -0.2% for methotrexate and -3.4% for placebo (95% confidence interval = -2.5% to +9.1% for difference). There were also … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
57
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(10 reference statements)
2
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In previous large studies sCK maximum values varied between 5 and 15 times the upper limit of normal [7,12,15,16,18,20]. It remains plausible that the sCK value represents temporary disease activity [5,11,24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In previous large studies sCK maximum values varied between 5 and 15 times the upper limit of normal [7,12,15,16,18,20]. It remains plausible that the sCK value represents temporary disease activity [5,11,24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Outcome measures utilized Dalakas et al [67] MMT based on expanded MRC scales (0-10), MVICT, symptom and disability scores, and quantitative swallowing studies Walter et al [68] MMT based on modified MRC, Neuromuscular Symptom Score (NSS), the patient's own assessment of improvement, arm outstretched time, and electromyography Muscle Study Group [50,57] QMT with composite MVICT score (Z-score), average MMT score (expanded 0-5 scale), grip strength (kg), Purdue pegboard, (number of pegs in 30 s), ALSFRS, IBMFRS, SF-36, muscle mass (DEXA), CK Dalakas et al [49] MVICT and MMT using modified Medical Research Council (MRC) scores; muscle biopsies to determine changes in the number of autoinvasive T cells and necrotic muscle fibers Rutkove [69] MVICT, MMT, and functional performance testing (time stair climb, up and go, 2 and 6 MWT) Badrising [70] QMT 4À grade converted to a 3.67 in one study while another converts a 4+ grade to 8 and a 4À as a 6. Even with these various conversions, the numbers so obtained cannot be assumed to be an interval scale.…”
Section: Trialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, all previous sIBM randomized trials have not resulted in statistically significant improvements in their primary outcome measures. 13,[17][18][19][20][21][22] With a single dose of 30 mg/kg, bimagrumab exposure is thought to have been above the therapeutic target of saturating ActRII for approximately 2 months. During this time, muscle mass, measured by MRI of the thigh and by DXA of the whole body, increased substantially from baseline, by approximately 5% more than placebo ( figure 3, A and B).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%