2002
DOI: 10.1029/2002pa000756
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of water column [CO2aq] with sedimentary alkenone‐based estimates: A test of the alkenone‐CO2proxy

Abstract: [1] The stable carbon isotopic compositions of alkenones have been used to interpret the long-term history of the partial pressure of atmospheric carbon dioxide ( pCO 2 ). Although extensive water column and culture studies document the potential utility and limitations of this approach, to date the accuracy of pCO 2 values derived from sedimentary alkenones remains untested. For this study we establish Holocene-aged, alkenonebased CO 2aq estimates ([CO 2aq ] alk ) from 20 sites along a central Pacific Ocean … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
62
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(77 reference statements)
9
62
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As phytoplankton, these organisms are concentrated in the upper euphotic zone of polar waters, whereas G. bulloides can live at a variety of depths and also forms a gametogenic crust in the subsurface. Moreover, coccolithophorids tend to bloom in the middle to late summer in the western subarctic Pacific, after the diatom bloom 9,10,11,12 , whereas foraminiferal production tends to follow the productivity of the entire phytoplankton pool and thus is at a maximum in the spring 9,10 . For these reasons, significant differences should be expected between alkenone-and foraminiferal-based temperature reconstructions.…”
Section: North Pacific Changes 27 Myr Agomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As phytoplankton, these organisms are concentrated in the upper euphotic zone of polar waters, whereas G. bulloides can live at a variety of depths and also forms a gametogenic crust in the subsurface. Moreover, coccolithophorids tend to bloom in the middle to late summer in the western subarctic Pacific, after the diatom bloom 9,10,11,12 , whereas foraminiferal production tends to follow the productivity of the entire phytoplankton pool and thus is at a maximum in the spring 9,10 . For these reasons, significant differences should be expected between alkenone-and foraminiferal-based temperature reconstructions.…”
Section: North Pacific Changes 27 Myr Agomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During spring, as the euphotic zone deepens and the mixed layer shoals, a diatom-dominated bloom begins, lasting until early summer, when most of the nutrients are consumed, silicate in particular 9,10 . However, during late summer and autumn, when the water column is most stable, a secondary biogenic bloom typically occurs, this time dominated by coccolithophores 11,12 . Alkenones accumulating in the sediments below this region indicate a modern temperature of 10.1 °C, consistent with the late-summer and autumn growth of the coccolithophorids, which are among the prymnesiophytes that produce these compounds 11 .…”
Section: Seasonality Of the Modern Subarctic North Pacificmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the available experimental results, the potential exists that different growth and environmental conditions trigger different carbon isotopic responses 23 . However, validation of the alkenone-CO 2 approach using sedimentary alkenones in the natural environment indicates that this technique can be used to resolve relatively small differences in water column [CO 2aq ] when SST and phosphate concentrations ([PO 4 3− ]) and are reasonably constrained 24 . We use alkenone unsaturation indices (U K 37 ) to determine SST and assume haptophyte production depths between 0 and 75 m at each site, bounding a range of [PO 4 3− ] determined from modern mean-annual-phosphate depth profiles (Supplementary Information) that is then applied to calculate a range of pCO 2 estimates (Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This simple linear relationship was challenged by a finding that cell growth rate also affects isotopic fractionation of phytoplankton organic matter and the (ε p ) is strongly related to the ratio of growth rate to CO 2 concentration (μ/C e ) rather than [CO 2 ] alone [28,29]. More studies [30][31][32][33] have documented that nutrientlimitation (either nitrate or phosphate) and Fe-limitation control the cell growth rate and thus affect isotopic fractionation. On the other hand, many field observations and laboratory experiments [34][35][36] have repeatedly shown strong evidence on isotopic depletion (negative shift) of alkenones during transport/recycling.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%